Browse / Mike Winger / Idea

Three problems with the Hebrew Roots use of Matthew 28: it misreads Matthew 5, ignores everything Jesus commanded, and contradicts how the Apostles actually applied it

The Law of Moses, the Gentiles and Jesus: Hebrew Roots part 2 00:42:45 – 00:45:19

Winger's three-pronged critique of the Matthew 28 argument

(1) The Hebrew Roots reading of Matthew 28 misses the full teaching of Matthew 5—Jesus came to fulfill the Law, not just affirm it. (2) "All that I have commanded" includes everything Jesus taught, and read in full context, Jesus's teaching leads away from Law-keeping to gospel. (3) The Apostles, in Acts and the Epistles, fulfilled the Great Commission but did not teach Gentile converts to keep the Mosaic Law—which is a decisive counter-evidence to the Hebrew Roots interpretation.

Your Tags

Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.

...more

Ask Claude about this