Undesigned coincidences — definition and how they demonstrate historicity
Winger asks McLatchie to explain undesigned coincidences as a distinct argument for the historicity of the New Testament.
An undesigned coincidence is when multiple independent accounts of an event interlock in a way that would be highly surprising if (a) the stories were invented, (b) one source copied from the other, or (c) both copied from a common source. The classic form: a question raised in passing by one source is answered incidentally by a separate, independent source. This provides evidence for genuine shared knowledge of real events — the hallmark of multiple independent eyewitness reports.
Your Tags
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...moreVideo
A Bunch Of Reasons Christianity Is True: special guest Jonathan McLatchie @ 00:44:102019-05-16