Consequence 1 of denying wrath: contradicts clear biblical testimony
Mike lists the theological consequences of removing wrath from one's doctrine of God.
The first consequence of denying God's wrath is that it contradicts the explicit and consistent testimony of both Testaments. Mike uses strong language — 'spitting in the face of Scripture' — to underscore the seriousness of dismissing a teaching that is thoroughly grounded throughout the biblical text.
← Previous
God's wrath is meant to drive people to Jesus
Next →Consequence 2 of denying wrath: self-refuting — critics judg
Responses
Scripture Commentary
article
Was God’s Wrath Satisfied in Christ or Paid in Hell?
Was God’s wrath satisfied in Christ? If so then how can sinners suffer God’s wrath in hell? This question is one that is often asked by Calvinists to those who do not hold to the teaching of Calvinism.
Theology
verse entry
1 John 2:2
Sections: cross_references, debate_points, exegesis, greek_analysis
Theology
verse entry
Ephesians 2:8-9
Sections: cross_references, debate_points, exegesis, greek_analysis
Your Tags
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more