Consequence 2 of denying wrath: self-refuting — critics judge God with the very thing they deny
Mike identifies a self-refuting irony in those who are angry that God would have wrath.
A second consequence is self-refutation: those who are wrathfully indignant about God's wrath implicitly validate the concept of righteous anger. If any human wrath can be appropriate, then God's wrath must always be appropriate. The critics' own emotional response undermines their argument.
← Previous
Consequence 1 of denying wrath: contradicts clear biblical t
Next →Consequence 3 of denying wrath: undermines divine holiness
Responses
Scripture Commentary
article
Was God’s Wrath Satisfied in Christ or Paid in Hell?
Was God’s wrath satisfied in Christ? If so then how can sinners suffer God’s wrath in hell? This question is one that is often asked by Calvinists to those who do not hold to the teaching of Calvinism.
Theology
verse entry
1 John 2:2
Sections: cross_references, debate_points, exegesis, greek_analysis
Theology
verse entry
Ephesians 2:8-9
Sections: cross_references, debate_points, exegesis, greek_analysis
Your Tags
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more