Ruth 4:5-6 -- Kinsman-redeemer typology: Boaz as Christ, the unnamed redeemer as a failed Adam-figure
Question from 'yo man' about whether Ruth 4:5-6 is typologically connected to Galatians 3:23-25.
Mike affirms the kinsman-redeemer (go'el) typology as clearly pointing to Christ. Boaz = Christ the Redeemer. The unnamed closer relative who refuses to redeem (because he is already married and would impair his inheritance) = possibly Adam, humanity's closest kin who failed to redeem and instead brought bondage. Mike reads Ruth 4:5-6 aloud. He qualifies this as theological theorizing, not firm exegesis. Ruth as real history, not allegory -- God uses real people's lives as typological pictures of Jesus.
Your Tags
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more