The whole debate hinges on how far 'sonship status' can be stretched
Mike identifies the crux of the disagreement.
Both sides agree on sonship status. The debate is whether you can stretch sonship status to mean 'therefore I could be an elder too' or 'therefore submission in marriage is wrong.' To answer this, we need to understand what Paul meant by sonship status in context. The context gives four specific things that sonship status entails.
← Previous
Why 'sons' should not be translated 'sons and daughters' in
Next →Sonship benefit #1: Being an heir — equal inheritance in the
Responses
Scripture Commentary
article
Where Mike Winger Went Wrong on Women
Comprehensive response to the entire Mike Winger Women in Ministry video series (Parts 1-13)
Scripture Commentary
article
What Mike Winger Gets Wrong on What Women Can’t Do
Response to Mike Winger's Women in Ministry Part 13 on what women can and can't do according to the Bible
Scripture Commentary
article
The Debates Over 1 Timothy 2
Response to Mike Winger's Women in Ministry Part 12 on the debates over 1 Timothy 2:11-15
Your Tags
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more