Claiming all biblical promises because "God is no respecter of persons" is invalid reasoning
Responding to the claim that Christians can claim all biblical promises because God is no respecter of persons or because they are grafted into Israel
The "no respecter of persons" argument is dismissed as logically incoherent: if it means anyone can claim any promise, then Satan could claim the promises of Christ too. The phrase does not mean that God's specific covenantal promises to particular people transfer universally to everyone.
← Previous
Anxiety about eschatology (pre/mid/post-trib) is unnecessary
Next →Being grafted into Israel does not give Christians the right
Responses
Scripture Commentary
article
Where Mike Winger Went Wrong on Women
Comprehensive response to the entire Mike Winger Women in Ministry video series (Parts 1-13)
Scripture Commentary
article
The Debates Over 1 Timothy 2
Response to Mike Winger's Women in Ministry Part 12 on the debates over 1 Timothy 2:11-15
Scripture Commentary
article
Neopatriarch Once Again Fails To Refute Cheryl Schatz
## Challenging my position that 1 Timothy 2:15 is a single woman
Your Tags
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more