Changing one's mind is not required for intellectual validity; core epistemic beliefs are foundational and need no further justification
Continuing the apologetics discussion about confirmation bias
Mike shares personal examples: changed his mind on alcohol (formerly thought it was sinful) and on KJV-only views (was following conspiracy theories). Feels more confident in those changed positions. However, unchanged beliefs are not automatically suspect. The most foundational epistemic beliefs — that senses work, that one can form true beliefs, that reality is real — are simply believed without further justification. These are not confirmation bias, they are the ground floor of all knowledge. God better explains our ability to form true beliefs than naturalistic evolution does.
Your Tags
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more