1 Peter 1:3 and the rejection of total depravity — God causes regeneration, but faith is not causal
Question from Joshua Stuckey about how Winger reads 1 Peter 1:3 given his rejection of total depravity.
Winger affirms human depravity (all have sinned, none can earn salvation) but rejects Calvinist total depravity, which holds that fallen humans always reject the gospel unless God first regenerates them (regeneration precedes faith). In Calvinism the order is: regeneration → faith → justification. Winger rejects this sequence. His reading of 1 Pet 1:3 ("he has caused us to be born again") is that God indeed causes regeneration — but faith is required, not causal. When a person says "yes" to the gospel, that act of faith does not cause their new birth; God does. Faith is the condition, not the efficient cause. This distinguishes him from Arminian prevenient grace as well — he simply does not see total depravity as requiring either solution.
← Previous
Practical advice for an agnostic seeking to believe
Next →Can someone be justified without being sanctified? Can habit
Responses
Scripture Commentary
tweet
@Oliverm05363868 @DMurzea @MikeWingerii But he calls egalitarians to repent of t
@Oliverm05363868 @DMurzea @MikeWingerii But he calls egalitarians to repent of their teachings. That's not what you do for secondary differences like Calvinism and Arminianism.
Theology
verse entry
John 6:64-65
Sections: debate_points, exegesis, greek_analysis
Your Tags
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more