Overall conclusions: egalitarians fail to make a positive case (partly by stretching Scripture); complementarians fail to rule out all women in all leadership.

Egalitarians fail to make a positive case that there's no real difference between men's and women's roles, partly because they horribly stretch Scripture to the point of contradicting plain teachings. Complementarians fail to rule out all women from all leadership — even if you argue it's 'less than ideal,' you cannot rule it out because of examples like Deborah. The extreme complementarian/patriarchal view seems wrong.