Browse / Mike Winger / Idea

Payne's view of verse 9: 'woman made for man' only means sexual partnership

All The Head Covering Debates (1 Cor 11)： Women in Ministry part 10 00:52:05 – 00:53:38

Mike further critiques the sexual-partner interpretation.

Payne interprets 'woman was made for man's sake' as meaning she is his proper sexual partner. But verse 9 also says 'man was not created for the woman's sake' -- by Payne's logic, this would mean man is NOT woman's sexual partner, which is demonstrably false. Payne never addresses this contradiction in his writings.
← Previous

Payne's view: 'glory of God' and 'glory of man' have differe

 Next →

Payne on verse 10: the woman has authority (exousia), not un

Responses

Scripture Commentary article

What Winger Presently Gets Wrong: The Head Covering Debates (1 Cor 11)

Response to Mike Winger's Women in Ministry Part 10 on the head covering debates in 1 Corinthians 11
Scripture Commentary article

1 Corinthians 113 And Head

In the last post I summarized the foundational points from chapter 10 that is necessary to the understanding of chapter 11. If you haven’t read it already, it can be read by clicking here
Scripture Commentary article

#More 110

One question that was posed to me last week was on 1 Corinthians 11:9 regarding the creation of woman for the man. Does this mean that the woman is somehow inferior to the man because she was created for him

Your Tags

Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.

...more

Video

All The Head Covering Debates (1 Cor 11)： Women in Ministry part 10 @ 00:52:05

2022-11-11

Tags

Philip Payne internal contradiction 1 Corinthians 11:9 sexual partnership
Ask Claude about this