kw

To Cheryl:

you wrote ‘KW,
I know that you have posted on this site before and I usually try to welcome each new person. If I failed to welcome you, I am sorry. That would be a failure on my part.

You said that you wrote to me and I didn’t answer. I did a search of my gmail account for your email address to see what it was that I missed and I found it and I now know why I didn’t answer. The email was marked as “to answer” but it was so overwhelming it was left until I had time to wade through it and that time just never came. When it was transferred to Word, it was 234 pages long!!!’

my comment: I never wrote that you “didn’t welcome me on your site”; because you did. I didn’t mark my email to answer; I don’t even know how to do that. What I posted was that when I emailed you, thanking you for your article on the 12 apostles, that I had wished you’d just had acknowledged me via email to basically say hi. I never said nor expected you to reply concerning my paper. The only reason I sent you the paper was to show you, in agreeing with you, that God is/has been calling women to teach. I also believe that we, all of us, men/women are here to correct the grave errors that are taught in the religious settings that are called churches. Just wanted to set the record straight.

you wrote: ‘So I briefly skimmed through it and it was filled with quotes about Zionist Israel and quotes about China, talk about the CIA and George Bush, a long history of the US and vaccinations, politics, satan’s system, Mormonism as a “denomination”, the Vatican and secret societies, Project paperclip, none of which are applicable to this blog.’

Cheryl, the first 200+ pages were all Scripture and inspired teaching of that Scripture. I put the Scripture teachings out first and then later what the world gov’ts are up to. The secular info was placed to show why we should never trust mankind/governments and to teach that the entire world is deceived including most of the church. You made it sound as though it was nothing but kooky conspiracy theories. There was a reason as to why I placed everything in it’s proper order. And that is to show that as God warned/is warning us in: Jeremiah 17: Thus says the LORD: “Cursed [is] the man who trusts in man And makes flesh his strength, Whose heart departs from the LORD. For he shall be like a shrub in the desert, And [shall not see when good comes], But shall inhabit the parched places in the wilderness, In a salt land which is not inhabited. Where was your discernment in all of that?

you wrote: ‘kw,

‘I appreciate you are zealous, but I agree with Grant that there are things to divide over and things not to divide over. Division that is over the non-essentials is very bad. This is the point of my post.’

‘Again, God says otherwise through Paul in: Philippians 3:17-18 Brethren, be followers together of me, and mark them which walk so, as ye have us for an ensample. For many walk, of whom I have told you often, and now tell you even weeping, that they are the enemies of the cross of Christ’

‘When Paul talked about the enemies of the cross of Christ, he was not talking about true Christians. The non-essentials should never divide us as Christians and it is a very serious to get to the point of identifying someone as an enemy of the cross of Christ. We do not identify such a one because they are a soldier or go to war.’

My comment: I realize that only a remnant of true Christians; the ones who obey God are never the enemies of the cross. That’s basic knowledge.
you wrote: ‘to get to the point of identifying someone as an enemy of the cross of Christ. We do not identify such a one because they are a soldier or go to war.’

My comment: The false “leaders” of the “churches” teaching and leading astray are the true enemies of the cross. I wrote the entire pile of false teaching which includes the promoting of and endorsing war. These I listed are not “non-essentials”. This is serious and never non-essentials.

you wrote: ‘During his preaching of repentance John the Baptist said:

Luke 3:9 (NASB)
9 “Indeed the axe is already laid at the root of the trees; so every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire.” ‘
my comment: I agree which is what my entire post is about.

you wrote: ‘The crowd then asked John what they needed to do. He told them what would be signs of repentance. When some soldiers approached John he did not tell them that repentance was for them to stop being soldiers. Rather than condemn them for being soldiers, the Bible relates the account:’

‘Luke 3:14 (NASB)
14 Some soldiers were questioning him, saying, “And what about us, what shall we do?” And he said to them, “Do not take money from anyone by force, or accuse anyone falsely, and be content with your wages.” ‘

‘There was no condemnation for being a soldier, but they were to be content with their wages.’

my comment: I agree; there was no condemnation to being a soldier:

Luke 3:14 And the soldiers likewise demanded of him, saying, And what shall we do? And he said unto them, [Do violence to no man], neither accuse any falsely; and be content with your wages.

I perceive that my posts may not have been read. Perhaps just skimmed over which would explain the serious errors that have been put forth in what I’m trying to impart.

you wrote: ‘Now I am asking that we put a period to these discussions that are off topic. While I appreciate that Christians can discuss these issues, I don’t want my blog to be a place of dialog on war, government, conspiracy theories, etc because this takes away from what I am trying to do here. It gets us off the task of encouraging women to obey God in the way that He has called them.’

‘So please, let’s stay on topic so that I don’t need to moderate the comments. I really hate having to do that as I believe in free expression but within proper boundaries.’

‘Thanks!’

My comment: I understand, but that’s exactly what I’m doing; a woman in the ministry teaching what Christ has taught me for the benefit of the church.

I respect you, Cheryl, but the non-essentials seems to be the focusing solely on the men vs women. Yes, it is important, but for all of the trillions of words written on this topic, where are the other gravely important false doctrines issues that should be discussed amongst all of Christendom for the benefit of the Coming of the Lord.

I’ve said my peace, pun intended, and thank you for the opportunities.