Kristen

Jeremy, you said:
“I honestly haven’t heard a good argument yet, and it seems you’ve given me your best. Craig, if you let the text speak for itself, it does show the comp side explicitly.”
Actually, none of mine were actually arguments for the egal position. They were actually meant only as reasons to question the supposed “explicit” complementarian reading of the text. I had not got as far as a detailed explanation of the egalitarian view. I think Cheryl’s DVD set would be a good place to find that.