SM
2010-05-29
NN at 461,
All I have been asking for is a brief exposition of your exegesis of Eph 5:22 on which you base your claim. No common ground is necessary for you to simply explain based on your exegesis of the text how you come to the conclusion that eros is operative in the author’s intent to give an instruction to wives that would differentiate them from husbands and be the basis for patriarchal hierarchy.
Your Tags
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more