Mark

Dave,

I’m rather surprised at your dismissal of Rom 10. Maybe you can answer why Romans was written? Do we really know as much as you think?

We are looking at grmmatical construction and the best you offer is that we know more about Romans that we do about 1 Timothy. Really??

Is this not just another assumption becasue you believe that Paul didn’t need to name this false teacher.

Your rejection of Rom 10 speaks volumes, especailly considering the content and construction and it’s direct parallel with sozo.

You offered un-similar examples and then totally reject a direct parallel discussing the same outcome of a condition being met.

I’ve had it… we agree to disagree i guess.

Cheerio