pinklight

Craig,

3 I know both egals and comps who can see the force of Cheryl’s argument from v15, but find it difficult to see how v11-15 then fits in with the context eg Kristen.

I can understand this somewhat.

My last attempt @#102 was an attempt to see v11-15 as dealing with the same subject as the whole of chapter 2 and find some possible explanation for why Paul could have referred to the parties involved as “she” and “they” in v15, and “a woman” and “a man” in v12.

I see. But what would that subject be?

From the responses I have got it seems like I am barking up the wrong tree and just showing my ignorance of grammar -it never has been a strong point of mine.

I don’t think it’s a matter of ignorance of grammar. The grammar is the details, the fine points of the over all picture/painting that cannot be IGNORED (the problem) which is what makes it just as important as the entire context (chp 2). The main problem I saw was looking for possibilities outside of what we do know, which is what the text provides.

I asked “Does that make any sense at all as a possibility to anyone else besides me???”
I have one hundred No’s from Pinklight and zero Yes’s so far. Doesn’t look very promising!

One hundred No’s lol 🙂 NO! ;P lol