pinklight

http://strivetoenter.com/wim/2009/05/30/neopatriarch-fails-to-refute-cheryl/

The first problem that Neopatriarch has with the connection to Eve is that he makes both Adam and Eve as a representative of the male and female with no proof at all that Paul is using Adam and Eve in this way.

So I ask, what proof does Neopatriarch offer that Paul is making a generic statement about all males and all females? He makes a claim through Mounce that there is a general principle being stated but he gives no data to back up such a statement. This is very poorly done and does nothing to refute my exegesis that “a woman” is a particular woman who was involved with false doctrine.