Craig

Cheryl @171
“Your example shows a general usage but doesn’t exactly fit 1 Timothy 2:11-15 as there is no definite article”

The definite article is not in my illustration because it is in v14. If you are correct on vs14 then this whole suggested interpretation falls apart. I am assuming in this that v14 is Eve- this could be wrong, but it may also be correct. I am following the reasoning from #162 “So in this view, “a woman” is mentioned in v12, then kinda in parenthesis v13,14 gives some background reasons and example for the prohibition, then the “she” in v15 picks up again from “a woman” in v12.”
I am trying to make the generics in v12 and 15 stand out more clearly by this example, so they can be evaluated as a possibility or not.