Under Much Grace

Well, dear Matt seemed to be less aggravated and far more patient (for a longer period of time) in comparison to last week’s go around. Matt’s argument for his complementarian postition impresses me about as much as the patriocentric crowd’s argument that Paul said that women should not vote. And when he can’t score, he whips out the JW pejorative. And there’s always “Can we just go on to the next point?” And this “I’m just repeating what you’re saying?” When that didn’t work, he starts with “If you believe A, then you must believe B and the absurd C.” It hints at black and white thinking as a consequence of presupposition or prejudice.

While looking for the Matt Slick blog (where short references are posted regarding the radio show), I came across some of these sites authored by a motivated individual. Here it is for what it’s worth.
http://www.blogger.com/profile/02631926376230920393

As my grandmother always said, “Consider the source!” I don’t know who authored these blogs. However, as we’ve seen here with Matt, he’s not above reproach by any means either. None of us are, but I was not pursuaded by Matt at all. His fast pontifications of “Yes it does” and “No it doesn’t” combined with his sarcasm were unimpressive.