Lin

check out this article on Grundems book Evangelical Feminism: A New Path to Liberalism?

http://www.albertmohler.com/commentary_read.php?cdate=2006-10-23

Notice the strawman argument we see being used everywhere about egals:

“In a brief historical analysis, Grudem demonstrates that denominations move through “a predictable sequence” of theological liberalism. First, biblical inerrancy is abandoned. Then, in turn, the denomination endorses the ordination of women, rejects biblical teaching on male leadership in marriage, sidelines pastors who are opposed to the ordination of women, approves homosexual conduct as morally valid in at least some cases, ordains homosexuals, and elects homosexuals to “high leadership positions in the denomination.”

After reading this article, I am starting to see where their ‘language’ comes from.

BTW: On doing a search on Grundem, I was astonished to find him very involved with the Vineyard Movement.

BTW: Can anyone define inerrency for me? I get confused. This is a huge deal with the SBC which is made up of Calvinists, Arminians, cessationists, non cessationists, tongues, no tongues, etc. Get my point?