Paula

Donna, #153:

I should have said, “misunderstand,” rather than “misinterpret.”

Either way, it is not true. We do understand. We do read the material at CBMW. I would turn your appeal around and ask you to take the same care you demand of us with material at places like CBE, the organization CBMW was formed to war against. This also goes for your appeal to examine presuppositions. Many are made by CBMW and their followers. And I can’t imagine a better “time or place” to discuss these issues than here and now. Cheryl’s blog is one of the few truly fair (egalitarian if you will) environments, since it stresses Christ-likeness over conformity.

Although your conciliatory tone to me is appreciated, I am aware of some of your history elsewhere, and the two don’t match. As an example even here, you accuse Cheryl of “doing a very clever job of editing to make yourself look good, and your sister look bad.” You don’t know Cheryl at all, and have made a false accusation against a sister in Christ, and done so publicly. Your statement, “It seems to me that Kamilla exposed you, and you want to cover your nakedness with a fig leaf of hypocrisy” is the sort of maliciousness and character assassination you are becoming known for. It is most difficult to believe you are sincere when you say things like “I love you, Psalmist. Come by to see me anytime, my dear sister.”

You can’t have it both ways, Donna. Either we are all your sisters in Christ and you love us, or we are your worst enemies and you hate us enough to make wild accusations in public. Even going only by what you’ve posted in this thread, it is impossible to tell which view of us you really have.