Corrie
2008-02-26
This whole Kamilla thing is like deja vu.
Donna, maybe you are getting confused between Lynn’s invitation that was also dubbed “shameful” among other things and Cheryl’s invitation.
I see that Cheryl explained to you that you were [once again] wrong or confused about the facts and you refused to acknowledge that. You have do this a lot to people and it does get wearying.
May I recommend that you be a bit slower on the trigger? Maybe you should really find out the facts before you start shooting?
I think it is honorable that Cheryl invited Kamilla to come over here but I could have told Cheryl that she shouldn’t hold her breath. Kamilla frequently takes pot-shots at people but then when she is called on her words, she behaves like she is being victimized. You would think she would welcome the chance to own up to what she says?
I won’t judge Kamilla as you have judged Cheryl. To each his/her own. If Kamilla doesn’t want to discuss these issues on this forum and she would rather stay under safety of the wings of Bayly and Co., that is her prerogative. But, it is not shameful and hypocritical to invite her. It is actually polite and cordial.
It is funny to me that so many patriarchalists can talk very bravely in certain venues but then refuse to discuss the same issues when they are asked some very straightforward questions.
Your Tags
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more