Browse / Scripture Commentary / Comment
Mary

Mary

2009-05-31

I’ve rarely seen anyone use as many citations as “Neopatriarch” did to say nothing more than “I don’t like Cheryl Schatz’s) interpretation.” He’s proven nothing with his non-refutation, except his own untenable preference for proof-texting…oh, and of course, his exceptional arrogance as well.

I found it hilarious, Cheryl; really, I did. All that effort and sputtering indignation, all because you’ve done your homework and come to a different conclusion than he has. At least one person takes “Neopatriarch” seriously, I suppose, and that’s “Neopatriarch.” But I simply can’t. His “refutation,” like his other comments and Yahoo entries, are simply absurd. What a waste! He’s obviously educated and has a decent mind, yet his apparent need to be “right” has so poisoned his interactions that he’s neither credible nor the least bit Christlike in them.

Let him revel in his little CCC-cloister and his “anonymous” blog. He and his religious patriarch cronies are fooling no one, perhaps not even themselves.

Your Tags

Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.

...more

Original Article

Neopatriarch Fails To Refute Cheryl

2009-05-30