pinklight

So today I am mulling over the inherent problems with comp doctrine. What bugs me most is that NONE of it can be proven. So I’m wondering why people, whether the pew sitters or the leaders who hold to this unproven doctrine, clamp on to it. What is so attractive about it? Or why are people attracted to it when it cannot even be proven? Other things can be proven from the scriptures like the doctrine of the Trinity, but comp doctrine cannot. Are people really that uninterested in what the truth is, what can and cannot be proven, facts?

Then I’ve another concern today as I’m mulling over comp ideology. I’m concerned with those who do know better, those who know that their doctrine is false having nothing solid to support it. Those are the ones that I am not happy with, at all. These ones are the wolves.

So today I’m trying to figure out a way that I will be able to be appeased with the garbage of it all.

Thanks for letting me vent, Cheryl! 🙂

And Neo claiming that he Refuted you on 1 Tim 2… *rolls eyes & getting a laugh* His claim of having “refuted” you is a perfect example of a main problem with those arguing for and promoting comp doctrine. There is no way around it – THEY do not even understand what they are saying by the very words they use. If he can Believe that he “refuted” you, then he can also believe that the sky pink and not blue. That’s how much sense he makes by such a claim. Where did he leave his head? Where most of the problems lie, is in BELIEF. If someone wants to believe that the sky is pink they will do so even when the facts show that it is otherwise and stare them right in the face.

Okay, I’m outta here, back to solving my issue with comp doctrine and those who know better…