Cheryl Schatz

davidbmc,
I agree that it is us who need the second witness. That is my point. Without a second witness, how can we be sure that we have not misunderstood what we think is a “law” that forbids women to teach men? A second witness is safe for “us”. God of course doesn’t need the second witness as He is God. We are not God and as fallible finite humans who are sinful, we are the ones who can be mistaken without a second witness given to us. In this, I too agree with Mike, although that is not likely how he meant it.