pinklight

Mike’s left out of the equation “God’s laws” and makes the framework “Scripture.” Yet “women should not teach with men present” is not Scripture but rather conjecture. Scripture is infallible and inerrant. On the other hand, Mike is saying that certain parts of it seem to imply this (biblical head”ship”) and that (male leaders in church) and if Scripture says something then it does not need a second witness. But Scripture happens to NOT say the things that Mike believes about men and women and roles. And that it happens to not say any of those things MUST be because Scripture is infallible and inerrant. So when women teach with men present they are not violating God’s law or Scripture but rather fallible human conjecture based on what seems to be implied.