Cheryl Schatz

Mark, you said to Kay:

You said “It’s that we see a completely different thing than “naming means to have authority over something.”
And thats the point. You are ignoring the historical setting of Hebrew naming. Why should you do such a thing and still be considered evangelical?

Mark, this one is below the belt. To attribute an authority to the man without any evidence that God gave such an authority to the man and then attaching Adam’s acceptance and identification of God’s creation as a necessary “Hebrew naming” that implies authority and attacking Kay as if she cannot be considered evangelical because she disagrees with you is extremely inappropriate behavior on your behalf. I ask you to apologize to Kay for treating her as if she is not an evangelical Christian merely for disagreeing with your importing into the text something that is not there.