Filter results by source database — Scripture Commentary, Theology, Mike Winger, or Pulpit. Click a tab to narrow to one database.

...more
All (615) Scripture Commentary (283) Theology (45) Mike Winger (285) Pulpit (2)
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-09-13

@BEWTexan @rightresponsem Using speech and not violence is not a pietist positio

@BEWTexan @rightresponsem Using speech and not violence is not a pietist position nor cherry picking!⎯its the position of Jesus and His Apostles!

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-07-16

@BaptistBavinck @Soteriology101 What leads you to believe I am unwise and unteac

@BaptistBavinck @Soteriology101 What leads you to believe I am unwise and unteachable?

question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-07-16

@MAClark85 @BaptistBavinck @Soteriology101 How many times have I shared this fil

@MAClark85 @BaptistBavinck @Soteriology101 How many times have I shared this film, BTW? Since you know. And she's not my wife.

question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-07-16

@PartBaptist Well, it all can be traced back to Augustine, right? It’s an interp

@PartBaptist Well, it all can be traced back to Augustine, right? It’s an interpretive framework. Sure, it proposes to be a correct interpretation of scripture, but I’m challenging that.

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-07-14

@robotcop1984 @sola_chad I already explained to you that the descriptions in 1Ti 3:1-7 use the male form of the words, but no actual explicit pronouns except ‘tis’ in 3:1 which means anyone/someone. This is how you would word it in Koine Greek if you...

@robotcop1984 @sola_chad I already explained to you that the descriptions in 1Ti 3:1-7 use the male form of the words, but no actual explicit pronouns except ‘tis’ in 3:1 which means anyone/someone. T

1Ti 3:1-7 in 3:1 debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-07-06

Regeneration doesn’t supersede the call to remain. John the Baptist preached “f

Regeneration doesn’t supersede the call to remain. John the Baptist preached “fruit in keeping with repentance” (Mt 3:8). Jesus said “abide in Me” or be cut off (Jn 15:6). Paul warned: “you stand b

Jn 15:6 Mt 3:8 Ro 11:20 general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-07-06

@dalepartridge @ZacharyConover I don't understand. Why wouldn't you baptize ever

@dalepartridge @ZacharyConover I don't understand. Why wouldn't you baptize everyone then...like have pastors in every hospital doing infant baptisms for every child to make sure they are in the coven

question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-07-04

@thebrighttunnel @Rach4Patriarchy I am not conflating anything. I never said women were stronger than men in general. And conserving the actual Biblical intention should be considered true conservatism. Tell me please: were women equally saved befor...

@thebrighttunnel @Rach4Patriarchy I am not conflating anything. I never said women were stronger than men in general. And conserving the actual Biblical intention should be considered true conservatis

question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-06-13

@megbasham It’s not progressive to continue allowing independent Baptist churche

@megbasham It’s not progressive to continue allowing independent Baptist churches to appoint female pastors based on no scriptural ban. Can’t speak to the rest of the disagreements, but keep the main

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-06-12

@megbasham It’s too bad that this was the argument given. I would think that it

@megbasham It’s too bad that this was the argument given. I would think that it is because Baptists have the right to self-determination of how they govern their local churches, and there are good Bib

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-06-12

RT @ryanschatz: @DennyBurk @TomBuck Baptists have a wide range of things that ea

RT @ryanschatz: @DennyBurk @TomBuck Baptists have a wide range of things that each church does differently. That’s because baptists are sel…

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-06-12

@DennyBurk @TomBuck Baptists have a wide range of things that each church does differently. That’s because baptists are self governed. These differences are not primary which is why they can co-operate. Why do you think you have to force your underst...

@DennyBurk @TomBuck Baptists have a wide range of things that each church does differently. That’s because baptists are self governed. These differences are not primary which is why they can co-operat

1Ti 2:12 question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-06-12

@merelyjwright @Eric_Conn How did it move further to the left? The churches that

@merelyjwright @Eric_Conn How did it move further to the left? The churches that define their own polity are baptists who all disagree about things yet knew how to cooperate since these were not prima

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-06-11

@BronWen727104 @BaptistLeaders At minimum, they should leave this as a matter of

@BronWen727104 @BaptistLeaders At minimum, they should leave this as a matter of conscience for each church to decide and not divide from churches who they don't agree with on secondary matters.

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-06-07

@baptistvibes Also, even in the case of mentor-mentee, this does not mean your m

@baptistvibes Also, even in the case of mentor-mentee, this does not mean your mentor has authority over you but that you are learning from them.

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-06-06

@baptistvibes Now, if Jesus says, “Do not be called Rabbi; for only One is your Teacher, and you are all brothers…Nor are you to be called leaders; for only One is your Leader, that is, Christ” (Mt 23:8-10), then HOW MUCH MORE would this apply to cal...

@baptistvibes Now, if Jesus says, “Do not be called Rabbi; for only One is your Teacher, and you are all brothers…Nor are you to be called leaders; for only One is your Leader, that is, Christ” (Mt 23

Mt 23:8-10 general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-06-06

@baptistvibes Also, about Elisha, in older English, one would call his senior “m

@baptistvibes Also, about Elisha, in older English, one would call his senior “my lord” which is like the word “sir”. It is a common term of respect, not a claim of slavery or total submission. Elisha

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-06-06

@baptistvibes First, Sarah only called Abraham “lord” in her private thoughts. T

@baptistvibes First, Sarah only called Abraham “lord” in her private thoughts. There is no evidence that he was her commander/authority. Especially since God old Abraham to obey Sarah in Ge 21:12 in t

Ge 21:12 debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-06-06

@baptistvibes So Paul was not lord over anyone? Being lord only applies within f

@baptistvibes So Paul was not lord over anyone? Being lord only applies within families? Elders are not lords?

question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-06-06

@baptistvibes Where do we see Paul himself acting as lord or others seeing him a

@baptistvibes Where do we see Paul himself acting as lord or others seeing him as their lord?

question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-06-06

@baptistvibes Where does the apostle Paul show that he treats himself as lord?

@baptistvibes Where does the apostle Paul show that he treats himself as lord?

question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-06-05

@HeGTiSunesis Again, I think you are certainly onto something. The idea that Pau

@HeGTiSunesis Again, I think you are certainly onto something. The idea that Paul was advocating for women to cover their heads to show their husband’s authority over them is almost certainly not what

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-05-26

@JamesPelton18 @The_Sig_ @TinaFoughty Perhaps there is some application in the context of a church in that you do not support your adult children who are living in unrepentant sin. A person who refuses to judge their children simply b/c they are thei...

@JamesPelton18 @The_Sig_ @TinaFoughty Perhaps there is some application in the context of a church in that you do not support your adult children who are living in unrepentant sin. A person who refuse

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-05-20

@JonByers186054 @_Nosoup4you__ Actually, we are different. I never once called those who didn't believe the way I did on this reprobates and occultists and call them to repent. In fact, I'm attending a complementarian church even today although I dis...

@JonByers186054 @_Nosoup4you__ Actually, we are different. I never once called those who didn't believe the way I did on this reprobates and occultists and call them to repent. In fact, I'm attending

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-05-20

@JonByers186054 You cannot even provide a single quote from these occultist teac

@JonByers186054 You cannot even provide a single quote from these occultist teachings so we can evaluate if I agree with it. Nonsense.

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-05-19

@JonByers186054 You have no basis whatsoever to associate me with occultists and

@JonByers186054 You have no basis whatsoever to associate me with occultists and God haters. None whatsoever except your disdain for what I'm saying scripture teaches.

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-05-19

@Meritocrating @_Nosoup4you__ @FavaAnthony The early church was also all Jews. Yes, the church led by the apostles. They had to figure that one out too. It is taking a lot longer to realize their favouritism of male over female and making it seem li...

@Meritocrating @_Nosoup4you__ @FavaAnthony The early church was also all Jews. Yes, the church led by the apostles. They had to figure that one out too. It is taking a lot longer to realize their fav

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-05-07

@philip_reformed @Bildor_MoM @smashbaals How does “nature” teach you that long h

@philip_reformed @Bildor_MoM @smashbaals How does “nature” teach you that long hair on a man is disgraceful? What about John the Baptist?

question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-05-04

@BytePhantom42 @haymes_joshua The only explicit pronoun in that passage is in v1 and is ‘tis’ which is generic. Why wouldn’t Paul be more explicit and state ‘must not be a female’? Rather, he uses character which any can attain to and not requirement...

@BytePhantom42 @haymes_joshua The only explicit pronoun in that passage is in v1 and is ‘tis’ which is generic. Why wouldn’t Paul be more explicit and state ‘must not be a female’? Rather, he uses cha

question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-05-01

@LordFerguson09 @Dankrightanon Paul is referring to “tis”—ie anyone male or fema

@LordFerguson09 @Dankrightanon Paul is referring to “tis”—ie anyone male or female. https://t.co/JRoL0zDyNn

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-05-01

@LordFerguson09 @Dankrightanon What does what you posted prove? Notice the prono

@LordFerguson09 @Dankrightanon What does what you posted prove? Notice the pronoun Paul used, “tis”. Why didn’t Paul say “if any male…”—why does he use a generic pronoun? https://t.co/d1GHTrzMu7

question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-04-30

@LordFerguson09 @Dankrightanon There’s a difference between using generic pronouns like ‘tis’ in 1Ti 3:1 and male forms of words and explicitly calling out “must be a man” or “must not be a woman.” Paul clearly isn’t intending to restrict based on wh...

@LordFerguson09 @Dankrightanon There’s a difference between using generic pronouns like ‘tis’ in 1Ti 3:1 and male forms of words and explicitly calling out “must be a man” or “must not be a woman.” Pa

1Ti 3:1 general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-04-27

@HeGTiSunesis Part of the difficulty with Paul’s comments is that he doesn’t explicitly state woman as also the glory of God and with Christ also as her head—one is left to deduce this as Paul seems to be noting something that a wife uniquely has as ...

@HeGTiSunesis Part of the difficulty with Paul’s comments is that he doesn’t explicitly state woman as also the glory of God and with Christ also as her head—one is left to deduce this as Paul seems t

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-04-27

@HeGTiSunesis I knew about the Hebrew refers to the heads of each of the tribes but didn’t connect it with the census in the way you have. Very interesting. Ex 30:12: "When you take the sum (רֹאשׁ, rosh) of the people of Israel..." The LXX translat...

@HeGTiSunesis I knew about the Hebrew refers to the heads of each of the tribes but didn’t connect it with the census in the way you have. Very interesting. Ex 30:12: "When you take the sum (רֹאשׁ, r

Ex 30:12 debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-04-27

@sola_chad Well, they are certainly not following your faulty interpretation. Ju

@sola_chad Well, they are certainly not following your faulty interpretation. Just like when 7th Day Adventist’s say I’m not a believer because I don’t gather for church on Saturday and observe a spec

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-04-26

@rightresponsem Egalitarians are not ‘godless leftists.’

@rightresponsem Egalitarians are not ‘godless leftists.’

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-02-24

@ronhenzel @WonderingBashir For example, Dr. Daniel Wallace, while I deeply respect him for his expertise, is a Calvinist and a cessationist and I disagree with his theological stance in these areas because I think he is wrong. And why do other Gree...

@ronhenzel @WonderingBashir For example, Dr. Daniel Wallace, while I deeply respect him for his expertise, is a Calvinist and a cessationist and I disagree with his theological stance in these areas b

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-02-18

@RobChristisKing @AsherJacob23060 @smashbaals You can't be cut off unless you are already attached to the vine, so their tribes cannot be cut off unless they were already included. Is that what you believe, that the Jews and Gentiles were already in ...

@RobChristisKing @AsherJacob23060 @smashbaals You can't be cut off unless you are already attached to the vine, so their tribes cannot be cut off unless they were already included. Is that what you be

question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-02-17

@RobChristisKing @smashbaals Fourth, this is the same pattern we see in Ro 11: “They were broken off for their unbelief, but you stand by your faith. Do not be conceited, but fear… otherwise you too will be cut off” (Ro 11:20-22). Both passages teac...

@RobChristisKing @smashbaals Fourth, this is the same pattern we see in Ro 11: “They were broken off for their unbelief, but you stand by your faith. Do not be conceited, but fear… otherwise you too w

Ro 11:20-22 debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-02-17

RT @ryanschatz: @RobChristisKing @thatdna @smashbaals Is Ro 11:20-22 referring t

RT @ryanschatz: @RobChristisKing @thatdna @smashbaals Is Ro 11:20-22 referring to nations and not individual Gentiles and Jews? The Greek g…

Ro 11:20-22 question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-02-17

@RobChristisKing @thatdna @smashbaals So yes, Ro 11:20-22 clearly teaches that a

@RobChristisKing @thatdna @smashbaals So yes, Ro 11:20-22 clearly teaches that an individual Gentile can be cut off due to unbelief—just like individual Jews were. Continuing in faith is essential.

Ro 11:20-22 debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-02-17

@RobChristisKing @thatdna @smashbaals In conclusion, Paul is not just warning ab

@RobChristisKing @thatdna @smashbaals In conclusion, Paul is not just warning about Gentile nations. The Greek grammar, singular pronouns, and the direct contrast with individual Jews show he is warni

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-02-17

@RobChristisKing @thatdna @smashbaals Fourth, Paul says “if (ἐὰν, ean) you conti

@RobChristisKing @thatdna @smashbaals Fourth, Paul says “if (ἐὰν, ean) you continue in His kindness.” This conditional clause shows that remaining in faith is required. The phrase “otherwise you too

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-02-17

@RobChristisKing @thatdna @smashbaals If this passage only referred to nations,

@RobChristisKing @thatdna @smashbaals If this passage only referred to nations, it would imply nations are saved or lost collectively. But salvation is *always* individual in Paul’s theology: “If you

Ro 10:9 debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-02-17

@RobChristisKing @thatdna @smashbaals Third, Paul warns Gentiles in the same way

@RobChristisKing @thatdna @smashbaals Third, Paul warns Gentiles in the same way Jews were warned: Jews were “broken off” as individuals for personal unbelief (v20). Gentiles can likewise be “cut of

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-02-17

@RobChristisKing @thatdna @smashbaals Paul maintains this singular focus through

@RobChristisKing @thatdna @smashbaals Paul maintains this singular focus throughout Ro 11:20-22: “They were broken off for their unbelief, but you stand by faith. Do not be arrogant, but fear” (v.20)

Ro 11:20-22 debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-02-17

@RobChristisKing @thatdna @smashbaals Second, the immediate context: In Ro 11:1

@RobChristisKing @thatdna @smashbaals Second, the immediate context: In Ro 11:17, Paul says some (τινες, tines) branches (Jews) were “broken off” due to unbelief. Then he addresses the individual Ge

Ro 11:17 commentary
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-02-17

@RobChristisKing @thatdna @smashbaals If Paul meant Gentile nations collectively

@RobChristisKing @thatdna @smashbaals If Paul meant Gentile nations collectively, he would use plural pronouns. But he repeatedly uses singular, indicating he’s speaking to individuals—each Gentile be

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-02-17

@RobChristisKing @thatdna @smashbaals First, Paul directly addresses a singular

@RobChristisKing @thatdna @smashbaals First, Paul directly addresses a singular “you” (σὺ, sy) in Greek: “You stand by your faith” (sy tē pistei hestēkas). “If you continue in His kindness, otherwis

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-02-17

@RobChristisKing @thatdna @smashbaals Is Ro 11:20-22 referring to nations and no

@RobChristisKing @thatdna @smashbaals Is Ro 11:20-22 referring to nations and not individual Gentiles and Jews? The Greek grammar & context show it’s about individuals. Let me show you. 🧵👇

Ro 11:20-22 commentary
← Prev Page 3 of 13 Next →