Search — Theology Explorer

@carol66944 @OrinRomine Trying to make 1Ti 2:15 into typology of Christ overrides Paul’s grammar and context. The verse speaks of a specific woman’s salvation contingent on “they” (she and her husband?) continuing in faith. It’s practical hope, not h...

@carol66944 @OrinRomine Trying to make 1Ti 2:15 into typology of Christ overrides Paul’s grammar and context. The verse speaks of a specific woman’s salvation contingent on “they” (she and her husband

1Ti 2:15 commentary

@carol66944 @OrinRomine But 1Ti 2:15 says “She will be saved…”. You can’t change ‘she…saved’ to ‘he…preserved,’ from ‘the woman’ to ‘Adam.’ First, Adam cannot be modified at the time of writing as he is dead. Same with Eve. Second, this doesn’t addre...

@carol66944 @OrinRomine But 1Ti 2:15 says “She will be saved…”. You can’t change ‘she…saved’ to ‘he…preserved,’ from ‘the woman’ to ‘Adam.’ First, Adam cannot be modified at the time of writing as he

@carol66944 @OrinRomine Well, you are wrong because that is what Paul is doing here. Paul is not permitting a specific individual whom he knows is deceived and teaching heresy to continue. She must first quietly (ie. while not teaching) learn the tru...

@carol66944 @OrinRomine Well, you are wrong because that is what Paul is doing here. Paul is not permitting a specific individual whom he knows is deceived and teaching heresy to continue. She must fi

1Ti 2:12 1Ti 2:15 general

@perspicacious_7 @Paula_333 I’m not rejecting scripture. If you were following along, I showed how 1Ti 2:12 is dealing with a particular married woman teaching heresy who needed to be saved, “She will be saved…if…” (1Ti 2:15). Every word of scriptur...

@perspicacious_7 @Paula_333 I’m not rejecting scripture. If you were following along, I showed how 1Ti 2:12 is dealing with a particular married woman teaching heresy who needed to be saved, “She will

Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-02-18

@ShamarYall @rightresponsem Except Joel is most certainly wrong on this, albeit he is consistent in his view. And yes, 1Ti 2:15 is there and yes, we have to explain it. Yet remaining single is what Paul advocates for in 1Co 7, so Joel's interpretatio...

@ShamarYall @rightresponsem Except Joel is most certainly wrong on this, albeit he is consistent in his view. And yes, 1Ti 2:15 is there and yes, we have to explain it. Yet remaining single is what Pa

Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-01-23

@philip_1689 @smashbaals Then you should be able to explain the meaning of Paul’

@philip_1689 @smashbaals Then you should be able to explain the meaning of Paul’s climatic statement in 1Ti 2:15. How do you explain Paul’s shift from singular to plural, “she…they” and his use of the

1Ti 2:15 question

Scripture Commentary tweet 2025-01-03

@Crystalisives @covapologetics Frankly, I don’t know anyone who feels confident

@Crystalisives @covapologetics Frankly, I don’t know anyone who feels confident about their view of 1Ti 2:15! All patriarchalists and complementarians I have heard from seem to believe that Eph 5:21

Eph 5:21 1Ti 2:15 debate

Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-12-20

Then moving onto 1Ti 2:15, I want you to explain the unique inspired grammar tha

Then moving onto 1Ti 2:15, I want you to explain the unique inspired grammar that Paul uses. https://t.co/N33frTC5Se

Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-10-26

@pudgenet @MikeWingerii Well, it was a particular kind of action going on between a deceived wife and her husband that was in play because he is associated with Adam who wasn't deceived and needs to be a participant in the wife's salvation (1Ti 2:15)...

@pudgenet @MikeWingerii Well, it was a particular kind of action going on between a deceived wife and her husband that was in play because he is associated with Adam who wasn't deceived and needs to b

Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-03-09

@JollyStine @ymmotrojam @MikeWingerii 1Ti 2:15 says “the” childbearing (noun), not the verb, so it’s referring to a thing, not an action. 1Ti 4:3 talks about those who were forbidding marriage. But this does not seem to talk about s3x in marriage. P...

@JollyStine @ymmotrojam @MikeWingerii 1Ti 2:15 says “the” childbearing (noun), not the verb, so it’s referring to a thing, not an action. 1Ti 4:3 talks about those who were forbidding marriage. But t

1Ti 2:15 1Ti 4:3 debate

Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-02-25

@PestyMerc @activity_no You know what, let me give you a chance since you seem to know what you are talking about. Please explain 1Ti 2:15 to me. Just one verse. Please tell me: 1. Who is the she 2. Who are the they 3. What is Paul referring to by sa...

@PestyMerc @activity_no You know what, let me give you a chance since you seem to know what you are talking about. Please explain 1Ti 2:15 to me. Just one verse. Please tell me: 1. Who is the she 2. W

Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-02-25

@Eric_Conn @mikeCAburritos Eric, why don't you explain 1Ti 2:15 instead of just quoting literally one of the most debated verses in all the Bible? - Who is the she? Who are the they? - Why did Paul say "She...they"? - Why did Paul use "the childbeari...

@Eric_Conn @mikeCAburritos Eric, why don't you explain 1Ti 2:15 instead of just quoting literally one of the most debated verses in all the Bible? - Who is the she? Who are the they? - Why did Paul sa

1Ti 2:15 question

Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-02-21

@LynnCDell2 @ronhenzel Whoops. You were referring to 1Ti 3:11 not 1Ti 2:15. I agree with the NASB on 1Ti 3:11 but not 1Ti 2:15. But whether 1Ti 3:11 should be women or wives depends on the context. Ron seems to have a problem with using wife in 1Ti ...

@LynnCDell2 @ronhenzel Whoops. You were referring to 1Ti 3:11 not 1Ti 2:15. I agree with the NASB on 1Ti 3:11 but not 1Ti 2:15. But whether 1Ti 3:11 should be women or wives depends on the context. R

1Ti 2:12 1Ti 2:15 1Ti 3:11 debate

Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-02-19

@ronhenzel Also, I believe that 1Ti 2:12 is actually properly translated: "But I do not allow a wife to teach or 'authentein' her husband, but to remain quiet." It's about a specific wife (the 'the woman' in 1Ti 2:14 and the 'she' in 1Ti 2:15) and he...

@ronhenzel Also, I believe that 1Ti 2:12 is actually properly translated: "But I do not allow a wife to teach or 'authentein' her husband, but to remain quiet." It's about a specific wife (the 'the wo

1Ti 2:12 1Ti 2:14 1Ti 2:15 debate

Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-02-18

@ronhenzel @LynnCDell2 And by using the article in verse 14 “the woman” Paul says something that cannot apply to Eve since the “she will be saved” in 1Ti 2:15 is future tense. We know then this use of the article is anaphorically pointing to the anar...

@ronhenzel @LynnCDell2 And by using the article in verse 14 “the woman” Paul says something that cannot apply to Eve since the “she will be saved” in 1Ti 2:15 is future tense. We know then this use of

Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-02-18

@endofanepoch @0x49fa98 No, you are the one who is misreading this text. Can you

@endofanepoch @0x49fa98 No, you are the one who is misreading this text. Can you explain Paul's summation in 1Ti 2:15 with his specific grammar? If not, how can you be sure about v12? https://t.co/nFc