Favorites ?

All items you've starred. Filter by source database or search by title. Use the star (☆) button on any detail page to add items here.

...more

Ok, getting back to answering Mark. Several of his paragraphs subsequent to the ones I have already addressed are expansions on the same issues. So I’m going to comment only on the ones that are left

Ok, finally getting back to this: NN said: “Let us apply the reasoning which you just outlined to a parallel passage of scripture, we’ll pick 1st Peter: [1 Pet 2:13](logos4:///Bible/1Pe 2.13) ~

Here is what I posted in the last thread, including a link to the essay by Payne about the nature of the word “oude,” which is what engendered this discussion: \*\*\* Cheryl, I’m sure you will agr

Here is my response to Mark’s second point. **I think the ‘lay down power’ here is pretty tendentious. Almost any complementarian would say something like all this, but would say that what is going

Cheryl, I’m sure you will agree that our English grammar construction and ancient Koine Greek grammar construction may not always be the same. I am relying on the scholarship of Phillip Payne, author

Mark said: “I am still interested to know why you think ’one woman man’ is generic (and thus includes female overseers) and yet why Paul needs to single out ’gyne’ in verse 11 since in your own admi

I find [1 Peter 5:5](logos4:///Bible/1Pe 5.5) to be compelling. Peter has spent most of his letter telling Christians in a pagan culture how to get along in that culture, including submission to the a

Getting back to the issue of whether authority of husbands is a God-given mandate in [Ephesians 5](logos4:///Bible/Eph 5): Understanding the underlying cultural assumptions can be very important in