The masculine gender of 'only' (monous) in verse 36 does not prove it addresses men specifically
Mike addresses the argument that the masculine word 'only' proves Paul is rebuking men, not the whole church.
D.A. Carson: every NT use of this particle in analogous cons
Next →Pauline style argument for the refutation view: three points
Responses
1 Corinthians 14 — Research Notes (Cheryl Schatz)
Collection of 5 research notes examining 1 Corinthians 14:34-36, including the eta particle argument for quotation/refutation reading, the non-existent 'law' reference, segregated seating problems, and commentary from RtNT and Bender showing contradictions with Paul's affirmation of women prophesying.
Women in Ministry Silenced or Set Free? Parts 5-7: 1 Corinthians 14, 1 Timothy 3, Galatians 3:28
[Music] the women are to keep silent in the churches for they are not permitted to speak but are to subject themselves just as the law also says if they desire to learn anything let them ask their own husbands at home for it is improper for a woman to speak in church 1 Corinthians 14 has been a diff...
Mike Seaver And Cheryl Schatz 9
Your Tags
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...moreVideo
5 Views on “Women Keep Silent＂ (1 Cor 14_35-36)： Women in Ministry part 11 @ 01:08:492022-12-04