Phyllis Trible's objection to the naming argument: naming requires both 'call' and 'name' together in the sentence; Gen 2:23 lacks this formula.
Egalitarian counter-argument to naming = authority
Trible argues that true 'naming' in the OT requires both the verb 'call' (qara) and the noun 'name' (shem) together (e.g., Gen 4:17 'he called the name of the city Enoch'; Gen 4:25-26 'called his name Seth'). Since Gen 2:23 lacks this formula ('she shall be called woman'), Adam isn't really naming her -- just classifying her gender. Without the full naming formula, it's not an act of authority.
← Previous
The naming of Eve implies leadership within their equality:
Next →Schreiner's response to Trible: demanding both 'call' and 'n
Responses
Scripture Commentary
article
Comp View Of 1Cor11 Mark
This post is a first. I have never before taken the writing of a complementarian and posted it on my blog
Scripture Commentary
article
Adam Rule Woman Animals
## Adam the ruler of the animals AND the woman
Scripture Commentary
article
Adam And His Ms Organ
The creation account has been used by many as a foundation to produce myths and stories. While this post will concentrate on modern day myths, it is also helpful to understand some of the historical myths about the creation of male and female
Your Tags
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...moreVideo
Was Women's Submission Just a Curse to Be Overturned？ Women in Ministry part 2 @ 01:11:042022-03-14