The Bible is not a mystical puzzle; unauthorized numerological exegesis is a form of public sin requiring repentance
Mike issues a strong pastoral rebuke of Mead's method and calls it a public, accountable error.
Mike argues the Bible 'communicates truth to us clearly and plainly' and is not a code to be cracked. He calls Mead's approach 'numerological trickery' that is not Bible study. Because Mead publicly anchors his claims in Scripture's authority, he is publicly misrepresenting Scripture and needs to repent. Anyone drawn toward this material should reassess their approach to Scripture.
← Previous
David Mead's third Scripture abuse: Genesis 7:4 'seventeenth
Next →Harold Camping and Family Radio: background, personal histor
Responses
Scripture Commentary
article
Where Mike Winger Went Wrong on Women
Comprehensive response to the entire Mike Winger Women in Ministry video series (Parts 1-13)
Scripture Commentary
article
The Debates Over 1 Timothy 2
Response to Mike Winger's Women in Ministry Part 12 on the debates over 1 Timothy 2:11-15
Scripture Commentary
article
Neopatriarch Once Again Fails To Refute Cheryl Schatz
## Challenging my position that 1 Timothy 2:15 is a single woman
Your Tags
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more