Matthew 5 and Matthew 28 are from entirely different contexts and cannot be simply combined
First critique of the Hebrew Roots interpretive move
The Hebrew Roots argument: Matthew 5 + Matthew 28 = all nati
Next →Big picture point 1: The Law had a beginning—it did not exis
Responses
What Mike Winger Gets Wrong on What Women Can’t Do
Response to Mike Winger's Women in Ministry Part 13 on what women can and can't do according to the Bible
@tlz1956 @Marilyns321689S @KaJuror @Franklin_Graham Really? And why is that? Can they understand well enough to be saved or do men have to be saved for them? 🤔 If they can, why can’t they teach others? Does Matthew 28:18-20 “…all that I commanded...
@tlz1956 @Marilyns321689S @KaJuror @Franklin_Graham Really? And why is that? Can they understand well enough to be saved or do men have to be saved for them? 🤔 If they can, why can’t they teach oth
Was Judas predestined to be lost?
Is Judas a problem for your theology? He can be a problem if some of your beliefs come from tradition and not from the Scriptures. In this article, I would like to discuss the full Scriptural view of Judas and ask you to test your own understanding against what the Scripture reveals.
Acts 1:16-26
Sections: cross_references, debate_points, exegesis, greek_analysis
John 17:12
Sections: cross_references, debate_points, exegesis
Your Tags
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more