Calvinist theodicy: God is not guilty for decreed sin because he is perfect goodness; skeptical theism is the strongest available path for Calvinists
Question from Matt Bach about whether the Calvinist claim "God is not guilty for sin he decrees because his purposes are good" is a form of ends-justify-the-means reasoning
Mike does not directly endorse the ends-justify-the-means framing. His response (as a non-Calvinist imagining what a Calvinist should say): God cannot be guilty because God IS goodness — he is perfect by nature, not by conformity to some external standard. On this side of heaven we may not be able to explain why he decreed certain things, and we don't need to. The best theodicy path for Calvinists is skeptical theism — the view that we are not epistemically positioned to judge whether God had good reasons for allowing/decreeing evil, and that demanding such an explanation reflects human arrogance. Mike recently addressed this in a video on his top atheist arguments against God. Skeptical theism is technically not a theodicy (not an explanation) but a challenge to the demand for one.
Your Tags
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more