Galatians 2 pushback: Peter's refusal to eat with Gentiles as social discrimination
Mike addresses the strongest egalitarian counter-argument from within Galatians itself.
The legitimate pushback: Galatians 2 describes social interaction (Peter refusing to eat with Gentiles), which seems to prove Westfall's point about social dynamics. Paul opposed Peter to his face because Peter withdrew from eating with Gentiles when the circumcision party arrived from Jerusalem. This looks like a social/relational issue, not just an abstract theological one.
Your Tags
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more