Kohick's self-contradiction: 'no authority' but also 'don't use domination and power'
Mike identifies a logical inconsistency in Kohick's argument.
Kohick first says there's 'no talk of husband's authority,' then says Paul warns against husbands using 'domination and power given them by their patriarchal culture.' Mike notes: you can't say there's no talk of authority and then say there's a warning against using authority. Kohick assumes the conclusion by asserting the husband's power is merely from culture and not from God's created order.
← Previous
Lynn Kohick's egalitarian view of Colossians 3:18-19: no tal
Next →Complementarian reading: Paul affirms authority but with Jes
Responses
Scripture Commentary
article
Why Mike Winger is Wrong About “Authenteō” in 1 Timothy 2:12 – and Why It Matters
Response to Mike Winger's Women in Ministry Part 12 on the meaning of authenteō in 1 Timothy 2:12
Scripture Commentary
article
Gods Woman Is She Needy Of A Representative Priest Part 2
In part one, ( click here to read ) we discussed whether God created the woman as needed or needy. In this continuing discussion we ask whether God has ordained that a woman must have a priest in the home to represent her to God and God to her
Theology
verse entry
Ephesians 5:18-33
Sections: cross_references, debate_points, exegesis, greek_analysis
Your Tags
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more