Mutual submission fails when applied consistently to all three household code groups
Mike's main argument against the mutual submission interpretation.
If verse 21 means everyone equally submits to everyone, then it must apply to all three pairs: husbands-wives, parents-children, masters-slaves. This would mean children submit to parents AND parents submit to children equally, and masters submit to slaves. Nobody in the first century thought this. Paul says 'submitting to one another' then gives three examples of UNEQUAL submission. The mutual submission interpretation would also undermine 1 Timothy's requirement that elders manage their children.
← Previous
Keener and egalitarians find husband's submission in two pla
Next →The Christ-church analogy strengthens rather than undermines
Responses
Pulpit
sermon
Does the Bible Really Demand Gender Roles? | Ephesians 6:1-9 - Conrad Macintyre
Verse-by-verse teaching through Ephesians 6:1-9. Examines the household code structure and whether it prescribes fixed gender roles or reflects a trajectory toward mutual dignity.
Theology
verse entry
Romans 12:4-8
Sections: cross_references, debate_points, exegesis, greek_analysis
Theology
greek term
προΐστημι (proistemi)
to lead, to manage, to be over, to care for
Your Tags
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more