Browse / Mike Winger / Idea

Payne on verse 9: 'woman made for man' means sexual partnership -- creates a contradiction

All The Head Covering Debates (1 Cor 11)： Women in Ministry part 10 03:30:34 – 03:32:05

Mike examines and refutes Payne's interpretation.

Payne's paraphrase: 'for man did not come from woman but woman from man to be his sexual partner; neither was man created for woman but woman for man to be his sexual partner.' This makes verse 9 say the same thing as verse 8 (absorbing it). Problem: if 'woman made for man' means she's his sexual partner, then 'man NOT made for woman' means he's NOT her sexual partner -- an instant contradiction.
← Previous

Egalitarians consistently ignore or absorb verse 9 into vers

 Next →

Gordon Fee on verse 9: woman is 'necessary for man' to fulfi

Responses

Scripture Commentary article

What Winger Presently Gets Wrong: The Head Covering Debates (1 Cor 11)

Response to Mike Winger's Women in Ministry Part 10 on the head covering debates in 1 Corinthians 11
Scripture Commentary article

1 Corinthians 113 And Head

In the last post I summarized the foundational points from chapter 10 that is necessary to the understanding of chapter 11. If you haven’t read it already, it can be read by clicking here
Scripture Commentary article

#More 110

One question that was posed to me last week was on 1 Corinthians 11:9 regarding the creation of woman for the man. Does this mean that the woman is somehow inferior to the man because she was created for him

Your Tags

Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.

...more

Video

All The Head Covering Debates (1 Cor 11)： Women in Ministry part 10 @ 03:30:34

2022-11-11

Tags

Philip Payne internal contradiction 1 Corinthians 11:9 sexual partnership
Ask Claude about this