1 Corinthians 11:17-34
1 Corinthians 11:17-34 — Discerning the Body: Fellow Believers, Not the Bread
The Problem: Privatized Communion
Paul rebukes the Corinthians because their gatherings "do more harm than good" (v.17). When they come together, divisions appear (v.18). Some eat their own meals selfishly, leaving others hungry, while others get drunk (v.21). Their communion was no longer "common" — it had become a private, preferred meal rather than a brotherly love feast. CS notes: "Communion is supposed to be 'common,' a brotherly meal of the whole. But the way the Corinthians were doing this was unbrotherly — a preferred and private meal rather than a common one."
Paul states bluntly: "when you meet together, it is not to eat the Lord's Supper" (v.20) — their behavior has made it something other than what Christ intended. They did not eat together, did not wait for each other (v.33), and did not share. They were "worse off for having assembled than before they met together" (CS).
The Tradition from the Lord (vv.23-26)
Paul delivers what he "received from the Lord" — the words of institution. The bread represents Christ's body "given for you" (v.24). The cup is the new covenant in Christ's blood (v.25). "Do this in remembrance of Me" establishes communion as a corporate act of remembrance — proclaiming the Lord's death until He comes (v.26).
"Discerning the Body" (v.29) — The Key Interpretive Question
"For the one who eats and drinks, eats and drinks judgment to himself if he does not properly recognize the body" (v.29, NASB).
CS's central insight: "discerning the body" does not mean recognizing the physical presence of Christ in the bread. It means recognizing fellow believers as the body of Christ. The failure the Corinthians were judged for was not insufficient reverence toward the elements but contempt for their brothers and sisters — eating selfishly while others went hungry, treating fellow members of Christ's body as unworthy of care.
This is confirmed by the broader Pauline context: - 1 Corinthians 12:27 — "Now you are Christ's body, and individually parts of it." The "body" Paul is concerned about is the church. - 1 Corinthians 10:17 — "Since there is one bread, we who are many are one body; for we all partake of the one bread." The bread symbolizes the unity of believers. - Matthew 25:40 — "To the extent that you did it for one of the least of these brothers or sisters of Mine, you did it for Me." How we treat believers is how we treat Christ.
The Judgment (vv.29-32)
The judgment Paul describes — weakness, sickness, and even death among the Corinthians (v.30) — is for treating fellow believers (the body of Christ) with contempt, not for insufficient reverence toward bread and wine. "If we judged ourselves rightly, we would not be judged" (v.31). CS notes: "If the man is to test himself, then the test is NOT done to him but BY himself. The purpose of the test is so that he may partake. So that if he judges himself he will not be judged." The self-examination of v.28 is preparation for worthy participation, not a barrier to participation.
Communion as Love Feast
CS records that second-century communion functioned as the climax of the agape (love feast) — a shared meal expressing brotherly love. Paul's words in 1 Cor 11:2 refer to "traditions" he delivered to the Corinthians, and the agape meal tradition was among them. The Corinthians had corrupted this tradition by making communion personal and individual rather than corporate and mutual.
Summary: The Lord's Supper Teaches Us to Honor the Body of Christ
- The Bread = The Body of Christ, the Church — believers are one in Him.
- The Cup = Christ's Life in Us — sustained by His sacrifice (Lev 17:11: "the life of the flesh is in the blood").
- Recognizing the Body = Honoring Fellow Believers — how we treat each other is how we treat Christ.
- The Judgment = For treating the body of Christ (fellow believers) with contempt, not for misunderstanding the bread.
Cross-References — 1 Corinthians 11:17-34
- 1 Corinthians 10:16-22 — The communion theology established earlier: sharing in Christ's body and blood means sharing in one another as the body of Christ.
- 1 Corinthians 12:27 — "Now you are Christ's body, and individually parts of it." Defines the "body" Paul refers to in 11:29.
- Matthew 25:40 — "To the extent that you did it for one of the least of these, you did it for Me." Treatment of believers = treatment of Christ.
- Luke 22:19 — "This is My body, which is given for you; do this in remembrance of Me." The words of institution.
- Leviticus 17:11 — "The life of the flesh is in the blood." The cup represents Christ's life animating His body (the church).
- John 6:56 — "The one who eats My flesh and drinks My blood remains in Me, and I in him." Participation in Christ's life.
- 2 Corinthians 13:5 — "Test yourselves to see if you are in the faith." The self-examination Paul calls for in 1 Cor 11:28.
- Psalm 106:28 — Israel "joined themselves to Baal-Peor and ate sacrifices offered to the dead." The OT parallel to eating at the table of demons (1 Cor 10:20-21).
Greek Terms
The communion meal is meant to be koinonia — corporate sharing. The Corinthians violated this by privatizing the meal.
Your Tags
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...moreRelated Articles (38)
Is God Male
Cheryl Schatz
1 Corinthians 11 And Paul
Cheryl Schatz
Paul And The Head From 1 Corinthians 11
Cheryl Schatz
#More 110
Cheryl Schatz
Why Was The Woman Created For The Man
Cheryl Schatz
Verse By Verse Through 1 Corinthians 11
Cheryl Schatz
1 Corinthians 113 And Head
Cheryl Schatz
Is There Support For Universal Male Headship
Cheryl Schatz
Shaming The Head 1
Cheryl Schatz
The Man Is The Image And Glory Of God
Cheryl Schatz
Paul Refutes A Faulty Tradition
Cheryl Schatz
Shaming The Head 2
Cheryl Schatz
Shaming The Head 3
Cheryl Schatz
Interdependence In The Lord
Cheryl Schatz
Is Short Hair A Sin For A Woman
Cheryl Schatz
Are Womens Gifts Secondary
Cheryl Schatz
From Bobbed Hair Bossy Wives And Women Preachers To Woman Be Free
Cheryl Schatz
Woman Representative
Cheryl Schatz
Authority And Created Order
Cheryl Schatz
Is Complementarianism Merely Personal Conviction
Cheryl Schatz
Do Egalitarians Twist The Scriptures
Cheryl Schatz
Adam And His Ms Organ
Cheryl Schatz
Comp View Of 1Cor11 Mark
Cheryl Schatz
Can A Wifes Authority Be Overruled
Cheryl Schatz
What Winger Presently Gets Wrong With Genesis 1–3: ‘Was Women’s Submission Just A Curse To Be Overturned?’
Andrew Bartlett & Terran Williams
What Winger Presently Gets Wrong: Male Headship: Is It Really Biblical?
Andrew Bartlett & Terran Williams
What Winger Presently Gets Wrong: The Head Covering Debates (1 Cor 11)
Andrew Bartlett & Terran Williams
A 14-Point Biblical Case for Women Leaders and Teachers And Why Mike Winger, The Gospel Coalition, and the Southern Baptists Are Wrong About This
Andrew Bartlett & Terran Williams
Where Mike Winger Went Wrong on Women
Andrew Bartlett & Terran Williams
Women in Ministry Silenced or Set Free? Parts 1-2: The Designer Knows Best
Cheryl Schatz
Women in Ministry Silenced or Set Free? Part 3: Head Coverings and Authority - 1 Corinthians 11
Cheryl Schatz
κεφαλή (kephale) — Logos Clippings (Cheryl Schatz)
Cheryl Schatz
Head Coverings in the Ancient Mediterranean: Research Clippings
Cheryl Schatz
1 Corinthians 14 — Research Notes (Cheryl Schatz)
Cheryl Schatz
Mike Seaver And Cheryl Schatz Discussdebate Women In Ministry 4
Cheryl Schatz
What Winger Presently Gets Wrong: “Women Keep Silent” (1 Cor 14:34–35)
Andrew Bartlett & Terran Williams
Did Jesus guard the communion table?
Cheryl Schatz
Communion & Lord's Supper — Research Notes (Cheryl Schatz)
Cheryl Schatz