Genesis 2:24
"For this reason a man shall leave his father and his mother, and be joined to his wife; and they shall become one flesh" (NASB). This verse is the first biblical statement on marriage, and its structure undermines the patriarchal framework that complementarians claim Genesis establishes.
Three elements define the marriage paradigm: leaving, cleaving, and becoming one flesh. First, the man leaves (ya'azov) his father and mother. In the ancient Near East, where patrilocal marriage was the norm and the bride left her family to join the husband's household, this is a remarkable reversal. The text does not say the woman leaves her parents — it says the man does. The verb azav is strong: "to abandon, to forsake, to leave behind." The man breaks his primary familial bond and reorients toward his wife. This undermines any theology that makes the man the permanent authority figure to whom the woman attaches herself. The text presents the man as the one who moves, who gives up his prior position, who is drawn to the woman — not the reverse.
Second, the man "is joined" (davaq) to his wife. The verb davaq means "to cling, to cleave, to adhere, to stick to." It is used elsewhere for Israel's covenant loyalty to God (Deut 10:20, "You shall cling to Him"; Deut 11:22; Josh 22:5). The word implies passionate commitment and tenacious attachment. Again, the subject is the man — he clings to his wife. The movement, the initiative, the bonding language all describe what the man does toward the woman, not the woman's subordination to the man.
Third, they become "one flesh" (basar echad). The "one flesh" union is the creation of a new entity — a partnership so intimate that the two are described as a single organism. The word echad (one) is the same word used in the Shema: "The LORD is one" (Deut 6:4). It describes a composite unity. The one-flesh union is not merely sexual but represents the total integration of two lives — emotional, spiritual, social, physical. There is no hierarchy within one flesh. The head does not "rule" the hand; they are one body.
The narrator's voice in this verse (not God's, not Adam's) establishes marriage as mutual, voluntary, and egalitarian in its foundational structure. Jesus quotes this verse in Matthew 19:5 and Mark 10:7-8 as the definitive word on marriage, and Paul cites it in Ephesians 5:31 as the great mystery pointing to Christ and the church. In every case, the emphasis is on union and mutuality — not on hierarchy or authority.
עָזַב (azav) — "to leave, to forsake, to abandon." A strong verb used for covenant-breaking (Jer 1:16, "they have forsaken Me"), for abandoning the helpless (Ps 27:10, "though my father and mother forsake me"), and for leaving behind a prior allegiance. In Gen 2:24, the man forsakes his parents — his primary authority structure — to form a new bond with his wife. The man is the one who moves; the woman is the one toward whom he moves. This reverses the expected ancient Near Eastern pattern where the bride is transferred to the husband's family. The text presents the man as reorienting his entire life around the union with his wife.
דָּבַק (davaq) — "to cling, to cleave, to adhere, to hold fast." Used for covenant loyalty: Deut 10:20 ("You shall fear the LORD your God; you shall serve Him and cling to Him"), Deut 11:22, Josh 22:5, Ruth 1:14 (Ruth "clung" to Naomi). The term implies passionate, tenacious, covenantal commitment. In Gen 2:24, the man clings to his wife — the language of covenant fidelity, not authority. The LXX renders davaq as προσκολληθήσεται (proskollethēsetai, "shall be joined/glued to"), which Jesus quotes in Matt 19:5.
בָּשָׂר אֶחָד (basar echad) — "one flesh." Basar means "flesh, body, physical being." Echad means "one" — the same word in the Shema (Deut 6:4, "the LORD is one"), describing composite unity. One flesh is not merely sexual union but the creation of a new social and covenantal unit — two persons becoming a single entity. There is no hierarchy within one flesh. Paul picks up this language in 1 Cor 6:16 (for sexual union) and Eph 5:31 (for marriage as a picture of Christ and the church).
Note on narrator voice: Genesis 2:24 is not spoken by God or Adam within the narrative; it is an editorial comment by the narrator explaining the significance of what has just happened. This makes it a theological principle about marriage, not a command directed at a specific person. Jesus treats it as God's own word (Matt 19:4-6), confirming its authority as divine institution.
- Genesis 2:21-23 — The immediate context: the woman is formed from the man's side, prompting the one-flesh principle
- Deuteronomy 6:4 — The Shema uses echad ("one") for composite unity — the same word used for one flesh
- Deuteronomy 10:20 — "Cling (davaq) to Him" — the same verb used for the man's attachment to his wife, applied to Israel's covenant loyalty to God
- Ruth 1:14 — Ruth "clung" (davaq) to Naomi — the model of faithful, tenacious commitment
- Matthew 19:4-6; Mark 10:7-8 — Jesus quotes Genesis 2:24 as God's definitive word on marriage: "what God has joined together, let no man separate"
- 1 Corinthians 6:16 — Paul applies "one flesh" to sexual union, showing the gravity of physical intimacy
- Ephesians 5:28-31 — Paul quotes Genesis 2:24 in his discussion of marriage as a picture of Christ and the church; the application is self-giving love, not authority
- Malachi 2:14-16 — God as witness to the marriage covenant; "He hates divorce" — the permanence of the one-flesh union
For the full argument analysis, see the Argument Library entry.
Summary: See full content for details.
Greek Terms
The man clings to his wife — covenant loyalty language, same verb used for Israel clinging to God
One flesh — composite unity; echad is the same word used in the Shema (Deut 6:4)
Your Tags
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...moreRelated Articles (34)
Wasnt The Garden Created Before Adam Was Created
Cheryl Schatz
Why Do You Say That Animals Were Created After Adam
Cheryl Schatz
What Does 1 Timothy 211 15 Mean
Cheryl Schatz
Does Head Mean Boss When It Is Connected To The Body
Cheryl Schatz
The Original Woman Needed Or Needy
Cheryl Schatz
The Husband As King Over The Wife
Cheryl Schatz
Dr Randall Buth Refutes Accusation Against Me On Carm
Cheryl Schatz
1Tim2Objections
Cheryl Schatz
Special Authority To Adam
Cheryl Schatz
Was The Man Given Authority To Rule The Woman
Cheryl Schatz
Adam Eve Fruit Inspectors
Cheryl Schatz
The Unfaithful Watchman
Cheryl Schatz
Silence Of Adam Sin
Cheryl Schatz
The Sin Of The Man
Cheryl Schatz
Three Spheres Of Subordination Shrinks To Two
Cheryl Schatz
Man Give Woman Self Understanding
Cheryl Schatz
Adam And His Ms Organ
Cheryl Schatz
Paul_And_Genesis
Cheryl Schatz
Neopatriarch Fails To Refute Cheryl
Cheryl Schatz
Neopatriarch Once Again Fails To Refute Cheryl Schatz
Cheryl Schatz
Adam Rule Woman Animals
Cheryl Schatz
Comp View Of 1Cor11 Mark
Cheryl Schatz
Adam Names Eve
Cheryl Schatz
Eve Usurped Adam Authority
Cheryl Schatz
Women in Ministry Silenced or Set Free? Parts 1-2: The Designer Knows Best
Cheryl Schatz
Women in Ministry Silenced or Set Free? Part 4: 1 Timothy 2 Deception & the First Created
Cheryl Schatz
κεφαλή (kephale) — Logos Clippings (Cheryl Schatz)
Cheryl Schatz
Mike Seaver And Cheryl Schatz 9
Cheryl Schatz
Authority Vs Submission Biblical View
Cheryl Schatz
Repost Authority Vs Submission A Biblical View Of Ephesians 522
Cheryl Schatz
Eph 5:22 and Mutual Submission
Ryan Schatz
What Winger Presently Gets Wrong With Genesis 1–3: ‘Was Women’s Submission Just A Curse To Be Overturned?’
Andrew Bartlett & Terran Williams
What Winger Presently Gets Wrong: The Head Covering Debates (1 Cor 11)
Andrew Bartlett & Terran Williams
Where Mike Winger Went Wrong on Women
Andrew Bartlett & Terran Williams
Debate Resources
9Egalitarian
(8)Pierce, Ronald W.; Groothuis, Rebecca Merrill; Fee, Gordon D.
Kroeger, Richard Clark; Kroeger, Catherine Clark
Payne, Philip B.
Keener, Craig S.
McKnight, Scot
Fee, Gordon D.
Belleville, Linda L.; Blomberg, Craig L.; Keener, Craig S.; Schreiner, Thomas R.
Clouse, Bonnidell; Clouse, Robert G.
General Exegesis
(1)Mangum, Douglas