Filter results by source database — Scripture Commentary, Theology, Mike Winger, or Pulpit. Click a tab to narrow to one database.

...more
All (1067) Scripture Commentary (388) Theology (94) Mike Winger (563) Pulpit (22)
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-05-31

@LogicSaysBurn @Cooper9DL That source is Leon Morris, a complementarian, in his

@LogicSaysBurn @Cooper9DL That source is Leon Morris, a complementarian, in his commentary on 1 Corinthians from the Tyndale New Testament Commentary series.

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-05-04

@NBidnz Yes, Ja 2:25 uses the term angels for the spies. The question is whether this is what Paul meant in Corinthians. So the idea is that he wants married women to cover their heads and men to uncover them because of spies? And there is no such c...

@NBidnz Yes, Ja 2:25 uses the term angels for the spies. The question is whether this is what Paul meant in Corinthians. So the idea is that he wants married women to cover their heads and men to unco

Ja 2:25 question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-05-04

@JoanBandy Are you suggesting v10 is a quotation from the Corinthians? Or is it

@JoanBandy Are you suggesting v10 is a quotation from the Corinthians? Or is it because of the spies that the woman should have authority over her own head? That seems a bit opposite what I’d expect i

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-04-25

@lilyswaller Paul’s intention was to help the Corinthians to understand the basis for the tradition to not cover their heads. The reason for the complication is that the wife has two “heads” because she symbolically links back to the first woman and ...

@lilyswaller Paul’s intention was to help the Corinthians to understand the basis for the tradition to not cover their heads. The reason for the complication is that the wife has two “heads” because s

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-04-24

@ronhenzel @AleahPursley As for 1Cor 11:19, yes there were factions in Corinth, and their rightness or wrongness is not asserted merely because they had differences of opinions. Paul was clear that dividing themselves by associating with a particular...

@ronhenzel @AleahPursley As for 1Cor 11:19, yes there were factions in Corinth, and their rightness or wrongness is not asserted merely because they had differences of opinions. Paul was clear that di

1Cor 11:19 debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-04-22

@ronhenzel @thecrazypastor While it is true that Paul often introduces quotations or topics from the Corinthians with “Περὶ δὲ” (Peri de, “Now concerning…”), he also employs rhetorical questions and contrastive arguments to distinguish his views from...

@ronhenzel @thecrazypastor While it is true that Paul often introduces quotations or topics from the Corinthians with “Περὶ δὲ” (Peri de, “Now concerning…”), he also employs rhetorical questions and c

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-04-22

@thecrazypastor @ronhenzel The only view that makes sense of this text is Paul quoting from the letter from the Corinthians (see 1Co 7:1)⎯this is for the reasons you noted. There is no such law which could ever be reasonably interpreted to suggest th...

@thecrazypastor @ronhenzel The only view that makes sense of this text is Paul quoting from the letter from the Corinthians (see 1Co 7:1)⎯this is for the reasons you noted. There is no such law which

1Co 7:1 general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-04-22

The idea that a woman’s vocalizing is considered as shame or like nakedness is w

The idea that a woman’s vocalizing is considered as shame or like nakedness is what is conveyed by 1Co 14:34-35—a quote from the Corinthian Judiazers which Paul is refuting. https://t.co/tJLVsd40Yy

1Co 14:34-35 general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-04-02

@ronhenzel @Whitehorse1255 Why else would Paul specify that “2 or 3 prophets should speak and the others should pass judgement (1Co 14:29)? Should we pass judgment on canon revelation? It would seem that there is prophecy made in Corinth that is not ...

@ronhenzel @Whitehorse1255 Why else would Paul specify that “2 or 3 prophets should speak and the others should pass judgement (1Co 14:29)? Should we pass judgment on canon revelation? It would seem t

1Co 14:29 question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-04-02

@ronhenzel Further, how did the Corinthians know when to stop doing what they we

@ronhenzel Further, how did the Corinthians know when to stop doing what they were regularly doing when Paul’s instruction was to eagerly desire to prophesy?

question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-03-30

@ronhenzel @ymmotrojam @CherylSchatz @JollyStine @pastherandie @peace_got @MikeWingerii How do you know Corinth didn't have elders? It was started by Paul, and Paul and Barnabas appointed elders in each church on their first missionary journey (Ac 14...

@ronhenzel @ymmotrojam @CherylSchatz @JollyStine @pastherandie @peace_got @MikeWingerii How do you know Corinth didn't have elders? It was started by Paul, and Paul and Barnabas appointed elders in ea

Ac 14:23 Ti 1:5 question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-03-28

@ronhenzel @ymmotrojam @pastherandie @kriesese @smashbaals The disjunctive "or" in Paul's letters is multifunctional and context-dependent. In 1Co 14:36, Paul uses "or" in rhetorical questions to challenge the Corinthian believers, which I assert is ...

@ronhenzel @ymmotrojam @pastherandie @kriesese @smashbaals The disjunctive "or" in Paul's letters is multifunctional and context-dependent. In 1Co 14:36, Paul uses "or" in rhetorical questions to chal

1Co 14:36 debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-03-28

@ronhenzel @ymmotrojam @pastherandie @kriesese @smashbaals Paul is quoting a full quote from the Corinthians as he told the Corinthians that God is not a God of confusion. Then he shows the confusion. And then he rebukes the two verses and the pridef...

@ronhenzel @ymmotrojam @pastherandie @kriesese @smashbaals Paul is quoting a full quote from the Corinthians as he told the Corinthians that God is not a God of confusion. Then he shows the confusion.

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-03-28

@ymmotrojam @pastherandie @ronhenzel @kriesese @smashbaals I appreciate this admission, but I assure you⎯there is no "sucking" of apostolic authority at all! Paul is giving the full context of what the Corinthians wrote. How could he include less an...

@ymmotrojam @pastherandie @ronhenzel @kriesese @smashbaals I appreciate this admission, but I assure you⎯there is no "sucking" of apostolic authority at all! Paul is giving the full context of what t

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-03-27

@kriesese @smashbaals V34-35 are Paul quoting and responding to the Corinthian l

@kriesese @smashbaals V34-35 are Paul quoting and responding to the Corinthian letter (1Co 7:1) https://t.co/WHlrSQuDIp

1Co 7:1 general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-03-24

@ymmotrojam Tom, you are the one that said if I was not interpreting the law the same way then I wasn’t being consistent. I merely noted that Paul as the author is the one who determines how he is using the term. And in 1Co 7:1 he tells us he is resp...

@ymmotrojam Tom, you are the one that said if I was not interpreting the law the same way then I wasn’t being consistent. I merely noted that Paul as the author is the one who determines how he is usi

1Co 7:1 general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-03-24

@biblemarriages @kgaugelo_N @SupermomShayla If that was the case, polygamy would be encouraged in the New Testament. Rather, it is clearly not encouraged. Monogomy is a requirement for leaders. And for all, in the context of asceticism and the probl...

@biblemarriages @kgaugelo_N @SupermomShayla If that was the case, polygamy would be encouraged in the New Testament. Rather, it is clearly not encouraged. Monogomy is a requirement for leaders. And f

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-03-24

@ymmotrojam Please show me this hermeneutical law that forbids Paul from quoting from the law (and providing the reference) and then quoting from the Judiazers in the letter from the Corinthians who reference the law without any clear reference? Thes...

@ymmotrojam Please show me this hermeneutical law that forbids Paul from quoting from the law (and providing the reference) and then quoting from the Judiazers in the letter from the Corinthians who r

question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-03-22

@ymmotrojam @Happy_AHeathen @CherylSchatz @JollyStine @pastherandie @ronhenzel @peace_got @MikeWingerii But we both believe that the Bible is inspired, right? In every word and even the grammar? I am not throwing out any part of it. Everything in com...

@ymmotrojam @Happy_AHeathen @CherylSchatz @JollyStine @pastherandie @ronhenzel @peace_got @MikeWingerii But we both believe that the Bible is inspired, right? In every word and even the grammar? I am

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-03-21

@MariusM38610501 Everything flows from the start of Paul’s argument. He commends the Corinthians for following the traditions he has conveyed to them. In this case, the tradition to not cover their heads was in view. However, there was some problems ...

@MariusM38610501 Everything flows from the start of Paul’s argument. He commends the Corinthians for following the traditions he has conveyed to them. In this case, the tradition to not cover their he

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-03-21

@ymmotrojam @CherylSchatz @JollyStine @pastherandie @ronhenzel @peace_got @MikeWingerii You said it was dishonouring to say Paul was quoting from the Corinthians (well, likely the Judiazers who infiltrated them like the church at Galatia). How is tha...

@ymmotrojam @CherylSchatz @JollyStine @pastherandie @ronhenzel @peace_got @MikeWingerii You said it was dishonouring to say Paul was quoting from the Corinthians (well, likely the Judiazers who infilt

question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-03-21

@ymmotrojam @CherylSchatz @JollyStine @pastherandie @ronhenzel @peace_got @MikeWingerii You know that Paul is quoting from the Corinthians elsewhere too, right? It’s dishonouring to the Holy Spirit for Paul to quote them and to correct them? Why are ...

@ymmotrojam @CherylSchatz @JollyStine @pastherandie @ronhenzel @peace_got @MikeWingerii You know that Paul is quoting from the Corinthians elsewhere too, right? It’s dishonouring to the Holy Spirit fo

question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-03-21

@ferdnk @MikeWingerii @JollyStine What, you think he was refuting the custom of

@ferdnk @MikeWingerii @JollyStine What, you think he was refuting the custom of contentiousness? He had to tell the Corinthians that all the churches don't have the custom of contentiousness? Very

question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-03-20

@CharmyRosewolf @jmmooreo Payne it seems would pick option 2, but he also agrees with option 3. “On account of the angels: The context here is worship, and Paul refers to angels in the context of worship elsewhere. Earlier in 1 Corinthians he wrote:...

@CharmyRosewolf @jmmooreo Payne it seems would pick option 2, but he also agrees with option 3. “On account of the angels: The context here is worship, and Paul refers to angels in the context of wor

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-03-12

@slow_down_Jess @MikeWingerii John is wrong because he misses contextual clues (1Co 7:1) showing Paul is responding to a prior letter from the Corinthians, and v36 which uses a rhetorical device Paul uses elsewhere to contradict what comes before. Th...

@slow_down_Jess @MikeWingerii John is wrong because he misses contextual clues (1Co 7:1) showing Paul is responding to a prior letter from the Corinthians, and v36 which uses a rhetorical device Paul

1Co 7:1 debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-03-11

@Crystalisives @NarnianAttorney @William34772026 @RSCharlton @MikeWingerii No they aren’t—Philip Payne is wrong on this and I’m disappointed. It is in every extant manuscript. Scribes recognized it wasn’t Paul’s words so they marked it or added notes...

@Crystalisives @NarnianAttorney @William34772026 @RSCharlton @MikeWingerii No they aren’t—Philip Payne is wrong on this and I’m disappointed. It is in every extant manuscript. Scribes recognized it wa

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-03-11

@914Ann @Louisa_J_Watt @ryancduff Which books? "After Paul Left Corinth"? "Seek

@914Ann @Louisa_J_Watt @ryancduff Which books? "After Paul Left Corinth"? "Seek the Welfare of the City"? Others?

question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-03-05

@ryancduff Complementarians reject the idea of Paul quoting from the Corinthians

@ryancduff Complementarians reject the idea of Paul quoting from the Corinthians and then refuting them. But why? "What? came the word of God out from you [men]? or came it unto you [men] only?" (1Co

1Co 14:36 debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-03-02

@JeffreyPWiesner @coachanthonyd Of course, 1Co 14:34-35 is Paul quoting from the

@JeffreyPWiesner @coachanthonyd Of course, 1Co 14:34-35 is Paul quoting from the letter the Corinthians wrote and then refuting it in v36: “What? came the word of God out from you? or came it unto you

1Co 14:34-35 question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-02-29

@GuyJones1111 Technically, she would be violating what that verse says, but sinc

@GuyJones1111 Technically, she would be violating what that verse says, but since Paul was quoting from the letter the Corinthians wrote and refuting it, then she's not violating scripture. https://t.

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-02-29

@agtheinfamous Hm. You could show him that Paul is quoting from the letter from

@agtheinfamous Hm. You could show him that Paul is quoting from the letter from the Corinthians in vs34-35 and then refuting them in v36: “What? came the word of God out from you? or came it unto you

1Co 14:36 question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-02-29

@Dirty_Casualty So men don't teach false doctrine? 1Co 14:34-35 is actually a qu

@Dirty_Casualty So men don't teach false doctrine? 1Co 14:34-35 is actually a quote from the letter from the Corinthians which Paul refutes in v36: “What? came the word of God out from you [men]? or c

1Co 14:34-35 1Co 14:36 question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-02-29

@TDisputations Well, yes it does...except Paul is quoting from the letter the Co

@TDisputations Well, yes it does...except Paul is quoting from the letter the Corinthians wrote and then refuting them: “What? came the word of God out from you [men]? or came it unto you [men] only?”

1Co 14:36 question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-02-26

@noahbergmann_ @TomWarlord @Revelation_14_7 @Eric_Conn Was Paul’s letter written only to the male elders in Corinth? Really? “To the church of God which is in Corinth, *to those who have been sanctified in Christ Jesus,* saints by calling, *with all...

@noahbergmann_ @TomWarlord @Revelation_14_7 @Eric_Conn Was Paul’s letter written only to the male elders in Corinth? Really? “To the church of God which is in Corinth, *to those who have been sanctif

question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-02-26

@MartinMarkLuth1 @Revelation_14_7 @Eric_Conn Paul is quoting from the letter the

@MartinMarkLuth1 @Revelation_14_7 @Eric_Conn Paul is quoting from the letter the Corinthians wrote (see 1Co 7:1). He ends with: “What? came the word of God out from you [men]? or came it unto you [me

1Co 7:1 1Cor 14:36 question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-02-26

@TomWarlord @Revelation_14_7 @Eric_Conn Related to 1Co 14:34, we already know that Paul was responding to things the Corinthians wrote in their letter to him (see 1Co 7:1). Except we don't have quotation marks in the Greek manuscripts. You have to in...

@TomWarlord @Revelation_14_7 @Eric_Conn Related to 1Co 14:34, we already know that Paul was responding to things the Corinthians wrote in their letter to him (see 1Co 7:1). Except we don't have quotat

1Co 14:34 1Co 7:1 commentary
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-02-24

@Tingamabobz @GeauxGabrielle @myteacherafreak @MissBNasty And just after Paul quotes from the letter from the Corinthians, Paul says to those who are trying to silence half the church, “What? came the word of God out from you [men]? or came it unto y...

@Tingamabobz @GeauxGabrielle @myteacherafreak @MissBNasty And just after Paul quotes from the letter from the Corinthians, Paul says to those who are trying to silence half the church, “What? came the

1Co 14:36 question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-02-24

@GodistheGoal @FlammablePink @GeauxGabrielle @myteacherafreak @MissBNasty In 1Co 14:34-35, Paul is quoting from the letter that the Corinthians wrote to him (see 1Co 7:1), and Paul's response to those who are silencing half the body of Christ? “What...

@GodistheGoal @FlammablePink @GeauxGabrielle @myteacherafreak @MissBNasty In 1Co 14:34-35, Paul is quoting from the letter that the Corinthians wrote to him (see 1Co 7:1), and Paul's response to those

1Co 14:34-35 1Co 7:1 1Cor 14:36 question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-02-24

@timotheeology @beherleader @FoundersMin @tomascol @conservmillen Origen is like many others, even those who were in the Church of Corinth which Paul rebukes by saying: “What? came the word of God out from you [men]? or came it unto you [men] only?” ...

@timotheeology @beherleader @FoundersMin @tomascol @conservmillen Origen is like many others, even those who were in the Church of Corinth which Paul rebukes by saying: “What? came the word of God out

1Co 14:36 question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-02-13

@AlexioBasinium @jold_92 @BasedTorba @AmandaTylerBJC Not sure what church you are thinking of…but I’m referring to the church at Ephesus under Paul and Timothy, or the church at Corinth, for example. For these, we go to the letters from Paul to deter...

@AlexioBasinium @jold_92 @BasedTorba @AmandaTylerBJC Not sure what church you are thinking of…but I’m referring to the church at Ephesus under Paul and Timothy, or the church at Corinth, for example.

debate
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-02-09

@TheWatchman1963 @VoicesHead100 @3HillsMinor @Rattle_Resists @Kdubtru @michael_ronning You are quoting from 1 Cor 14:34-35 without noticing that Paul has been responding to things the Corinthians previously wrote to him. Just after this, Paul says, “...

@TheWatchman1963 @VoicesHead100 @3HillsMinor @Rattle_Resists @Kdubtru @michael_ronning You are quoting from 1 Cor 14:34-35 without noticing that Paul has been responding to things the Corinthians prev

1 Cor 14:34-35 1 Cor 14:36 question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-02-09

@LapisRobustus No. Let's start with 1 Cor 14:34-35. Paul is responding to things the Corinthians wrote to him in their prior letter. These verses can be taken with quotation marks. Paul then says in v36, “What? came the word of God out from you [men]...

@LapisRobustus No. Let's start with 1 Cor 14:34-35. Paul is responding to things the Corinthians wrote to him in their prior letter. These verses can be taken with quotation marks. Paul then says in v

1 Cor 14:34-35 question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-02-05

@Richard89885354 @MarkGrote Paul was quoting many times from the letter from the Corinthians (see 1 Cor 7:1). You have to consider this possibility since what he seems to be saying in 1 Cor 14:34-35 contradicts what he says in the rest of the chapter...

@Richard89885354 @MarkGrote Paul was quoting many times from the letter from the Corinthians (see 1 Cor 7:1). You have to consider this possibility since what he seems to be saying in 1 Cor 14:34-35 c

1 Cor 14:34-35 1 Cor 7:1 general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-02-04

@skcmonastery @Protestia No, this is not what Paul is saying in 1 Cor 14:34-35 as he is quoting from the prior letter from the Corinthians! v36 says: "What? came the word of God out from you [men]? or came it unto you [men] only?” (KJV) The fact is...

@skcmonastery @Protestia No, this is not what Paul is saying in 1 Cor 14:34-35 as he is quoting from the prior letter from the Corinthians! v36 says: "What? came the word of God out from you [men]? o

1 Cor 14:34-35 question
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-01-22

@bagby_abe @Protestia Paul is interacting with the letter the Corinthians wrote to him (see 1 Cor 7:1). If Paul was silencing women, then he’s contradicting himself: “For you can *all* prophesy one by one, so that *all* may learn and *all* may be e...

@bagby_abe @Protestia Paul is interacting with the letter the Corinthians wrote to him (see 1 Cor 7:1). If Paul was silencing women, then he’s contradicting himself: “For you can *all* prophesy one

1 Cor 14:36 1 Cor 7:1 general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-01-20

Here's a commentary on this verse from Leon Morris in the TNTC "1 Corinthians: an introduction and commentary" (Vol. 7, p. 149). Morris states that kephale in LSJ is "never for the leader of a group." He believes it means 'source' (as 'head' of a r...

Here's a commentary on this verse from Leon Morris in the TNTC "1 Corinthians: an introduction and commentary" (Vol. 7, p. 149). Morris states that kephale in LSJ is "never for the leader of a group.

commentary
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-01-16

@CSavedByGrace18 @TWFtrish Take another look at this passage. Paul is quoting f

@CSavedByGrace18 @TWFtrish Take another look at this passage. Paul is quoting from the letter from the Corinthians and refuting it. https://t.co/WHlrSQvbxX

general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-01-12

@imanii4u @drbrudd Yes, you have noted a clear problem with his interpretation h

@imanii4u @drbrudd Yes, you have noted a clear problem with his interpretation here. If we instead understand v34-35 as Paul quoting from the letter from the Corinthians (ie. 1 Cor 7:1), then this re

1 Cor 7:1 general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-01-12

@liquid_danno I finally got through Payne's book. I find he says some good things and some very strange things. - His argument on 1 Cor 14:34-35 being an addition to the text⎯which does align with the idea that Paul is quoting from the Corinthian l...

@liquid_danno I finally got through Payne's book. I find he says some good things and some very strange things. - His argument on 1 Cor 14:34-35 being an addition to the text⎯which does align with t

1 Cor 14:34-35 general
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-01-05

In 1 Cor 14:34-35, Paul is quoting from the letter that the Corinthians wrote (see 1 Cor 7:1) and using the contrastive “or” (which is typical of Paul) to rhetorically refute it: “What? Came the word of God out from you [men]? Or came it unto you [me...

In 1 Cor 14:34-35, Paul is quoting from the letter that the Corinthians wrote (see 1 Cor 7:1) and using the contrastive “or” (which is typical of Paul) to rhetorically refute it: “What? Came the word

1 Cor 14:34-35 1 Cor 14:36 1 Cor 7:1 question
← Prev Page 5 of 22 Next →