Filter results by source database — Scripture Commentary, Theology, Mike Winger, or Pulpit. Click a tab to narrow to one database.

...more
All (7) Scripture Commentary (1) Theology (1) Mike Winger (5)
Scripture Commentary tweet 2024-03-24

@ymmotrojam I do not believe it’s a textual variant. But I also believe that Pau

@ymmotrojam I do not believe it’s a textual variant. But I also believe that Paul is allowed to quote the letter he said he was responding to. Every word makes sense only in this way. https://t.co/WHl

debate
Theology verse entry

Hebrews 2:9

Sections: cross_references, debate_points, exegesis

Hebrews 2:9 soteriology,atonement,unlimited atonement,Calvinism,suffering,scope of atonement,tasting death
Mike Winger idea 2022-11-11

Early textual variant substitutes 'covering' (kalumma) for 'authority' (exousia) in verse 10

Mike provides additional evidence from manuscript tradition.

1 Corinthians 11:10 1 Corinthians 11:10 exousia kalumma
Mike Winger idea 2022-12-04

The displacement manuscripts likely derive from a single source

Mike explains that the handful of manuscripts with relocated verses may trace back to one scribal change.

textual criticism Gordon Fee A.C. Wire
Mike Winger idea 2018-04-11

Reason 4 refuted: The psychological power of contradiction lists outweighs their actual evidential force; contradictions would not disprove inspiration anyway

The skeptic links to the Skeptic's Annotated Bible list of hundreds of alleged biblical contradictions.

James 2 James 2 inspiration tests biblical contradictions
Mike Winger idea 2018-12-01

Recommendation: Mike has a three-video playlist on translations and complex textual issues related to the Bible, covering topics like the longer ending of Mark and textual variants

Answer to 'The Real Effects' about where to find more on Mark and Scripture authority

Mark 16 textual criticism New Testament manuscripts Mark 16
Mike Winger idea 2021-03-12

Textual variants and extra verses in modern translations do not undermine inerrancy or preservation — they represent more, not less

Q18 from Chris Levy: How do we reconcile inerrancy and preservation when modern translations say verses have been added (e.g., ending of Mark, Acts 8:37)?

Mark 16 ending Acts 8:37 translation methodology textual criticism inerrancy