Favorites

All items you've starred. Filter by source database or search by title. Use the star (☆) button on any detail page to add items here.

...more

Your personal starred items. Star any item from its detail page to save it here.

Scripture Commentary comment Cheryl on "Why Was Adam Not Deceived"

Michael, Martin, Paula – go ahead and continue to discuss the issues as I work on my responses. I may not be as fast as you folks are 🙂 Michael: Regarding your first post (#1).  You said:  “Cher

Scripture Commentary comment Cheryl on "Why Adam Wasnt Deceived Part Two"

Okay, I’m back. There must be a limit to how long these posts and comments can be because my post kept disappearing. Oh well, to carry on… Michael you said “I am sleepless so I have been surfing the

Scripture Commentary comment Cheryl on "1Tim2Objections"

Diane Sellner from CARM has apparently decided to do Matt’s work and reply to my article so I gladly put her comments for all to see and so I can soundly answer them. Diane is answering my articles th

Scripture Commentary comment Cheryl on "Why Adam Wasnt Deceived Part Two"

Hi Michael, No your teacher analogy isn’t correct. I didn’t even think it try to pull it apart because it is meaningless to me. I would rather put my effort into the inspired Hebrew. English does not

Scripture Commentary comment Cheryl on "Dr Randall Buth Refutes Accusation Against Me On Carm"

Diane Sellner posted “En Hakkore’s” “refutation” of me on CARM and here is my answer: > Originally Posted by Diane S (Quoting “En Hakkore”) > “Firstly, you baited with the name Bergen for three pos

Scripture Commentary comment Cheryl on "Could The Messiah Have Been A Woman"

Good day Kerryn (that’s Canadian for gidday!) Great questions. You said: > The verses you use to make your point regarding Adam being a ‘man’ use the word anthropos, ([Romans 5:12,19](logos4:/

Scripture Commentary comment Cheryl on "Why Adam Wasnt Deceived Part Two"

Michael, Thanks a bunch for posting some of your questions, because it helps me to understand your mindset and I am hoping I can help you understand my mindset too even if it is only a little. You sa

Scripture Commentary comment Cheryl on "What Does 1 Timothy 211 15 Mean"

Michael, You said: “[Genesis 2](logos4:///Bible/Ge 2) does not contradict chapter 1, since it does not affirm exactly when God created the animals. He simply says He brought the animals (which He h

Scripture Commentary comment Cheryl on "Gods Woman Is She Needy Of A Representative Priest Part 2"

Charis, No you are not going to be disowned here. It is my desire that this blog will always be a loving community. One way to show love and community is to show acceptance. Another important way to

Scripture Commentary comment Cheryl on "What Does 1 Timothy 211 15 Mean"

Hi Michael, You ask a great question about the creation of animals. First of all in answer to your question, the issue is not about animals ONLY being created after Adam. The Hebrew is specific in th

Scripture Commentary comment Cheryl on "Why Was Adam Not Deceived"

Michael: Regarding your post #2 on the length of days. You said “The seventh day has not ended. Is Hebrews in error when it suggests the seven day was not 24 hours?†I understand and I think most

Scripture Commentary comment Cheryl on "The Rest Of The Story 1 Timothy 211 15 And Matt Slick"

Metacrock, No offense taken at all. I don’t mind people arguing with passion. I happen to love people who have lots of passion. By the way, you may be interested to know that “a woman” absolutely can

Scripture Commentary comment Cheryl on "Dr Randall Buth Refutes Accusation Against Me On Carm"

It is interesting that Diane Sellner keeps repeating that “En” has refuted me regarding Dr. Buth’s work on the Hebrew grammar that proves that [Genesis 2](logos4:///Bible/Ge 2) has the animals and the

Scripture Commentary comment Cheryl on "Matt Slick And Cheryl Schatz"

Matt Slick has answered my request for a written debate by posting this on his discussion board: > I am in the midst of two debates right now, prepping, etc. and I find out that “a woman” has said I

Scripture Commentary comment Cheryl on "Matt Slick And Cheryl Schatz Debate 2"

Regarding Matt’s comments on the Greek word for teach which is didasko, Matt was trying to say that because the word for teach used in this passage is a normal word for teach not one specifically for

Scripture Commentary comment Cheryl on "Is There Support For Universal Male Headship"

Hi Martin, Dave Hunt is a very good apologist in my opinion. We will attending his conference this summer and then I will get to meet him in person. As far as Sandy Simpson and his DVD – yes there w

Scripture Commentary comment Cheryl on "What Does 1 Timothy 211 15 Mean"

Hi Michael, I am not a young earth type per se, because I just want the truth of God’s word and whatever that is, is good with me. I have looked at Hugh Ross’ material and I have seen his debates

Scripture Commentary comment Cheryl on "Prayer Request"

Don, Thanks also for keeping me up to date without me having to go back on that abusive board. The fact that CARM’s VP keeps calling me “radio poison” shows that the charge is accurate. They are not

Scripture Commentary comment Cheryl on "The Case Against Eve"

Don, The real question is whether we should trust Eve’s testimony.  Eve said “God said…” In Jewish tradition, woman was not to be trusted.  The woman was not to be believed in court because women we

Scripture Commentary comment Cheryl on "Prayer Request"

Charis, I apologized because I got the date wrong. I also wanted to re-listen to the quote myself and couldn’t find it. I know that he said that I couldn’t come back on the program because I was “rad

Scripture Commentary comment Cheryl on "Gods Woman Is She Needy Of A Representative Priest Part 2"

I think we are really getting off topic here and I think it might be good to move this discussion somewhere else. I just don’t know where that somewhere else would be right now. I will have to think a

Scripture Commentary comment Cheryl on "Headcoverings And Authority"

Hi Matt, Thank you for coming to this blog. You are most certainly welcome here and your opposing viewpoint is welcome to be expressed. Don’t be surprised, though, if you find some well thought out c

Scripture Commentary comment Cheryl on "Pauls Ordination"

Hi Don, > ” The lot was an accepted way to make decisions and besides being random it might mean they voted.” While the “lot” was an accepted way to make decisions in the OT, it is not shown to be a

Scripture Commentary comment Cheryl on "Adam As Head Of The Family"

Hello K, Men do not carry a different sin nature than women do. We are all born in sin and all of us have inherited the sin nature. This sin nature comes from Adam through the father’s seed. Since

Scripture Commentary comment Cheryl on "Scriptural Fences"

tiro3, What you do is highlight a word when you are in the regular comment mode (not html) and once the word is highlighted the little chain above will become visible. Click on that and you can add a

Scripture Commentary comment Cheryl on "What Does 1 Timothy 211 15 Mean"

Sam, I don’t think that these kinds of conversations expose ignorance at all. I think they are wonderful at helping us as Christians to experience “iron sharpening ironâ€. When I first understoo

Scripture Commentary comment Cheryl on "Matt Slick And Cheryl Schatz Debate 2"

Guys, As you listen to the audio from last night’s debate remember one thing…I asked to share why I believed that “a woman” was a particular woman and not “all women” and Matt refused to allow me to

Scripture Commentary comment Cheryl on "Does Husband Of One Wife Disqualify Women From Being A Pastor"

Hello there, I am back in the saddle although I am doing ministry work at the same time as I am packing up our second load of belongings. Busy times! I appreciate that your husband is trying hard to

Scripture Commentary comment Cheryl on "1 Corinthians 113 And Head"

Kerryn, Boy I thought I was being thorough, but I forgot to include some of your questions that you posed earlier regarding verse 3. You asked: “further regarding v 3: what is interesting to also n