Filter results by source database — Scripture Commentary, Theology, Mike Winger, or Pulpit. Click a tab to narrow to one database.

...more
All (11) Mike Winger (11)
Mike Winger idea 2019-07-24

1 Timothy 4:10 — God is the savior of all people, especially those who believe

Mike cites 1 Tim 4:10 as another clear text against limited atonement.

1 Timothy 4:10 1 Timothy 4:10 unlimited atonement extent vs. application
Mike Winger idea 2019-07-24

Response to Trinitarian harmony #2: the Father can have complexity in his desires — saving all who believe

Mike offers a positive alternative to the Calvinist Trinitarian harmony construct.

Trinity faith unlimited atonement
Mike Winger idea 2019-07-24

Extent vs. application: atonement intended for all, applied to those who believe

Mike's synthesis of the Father's intent in the atonement.

faith unlimited atonement extent vs. application
Mike Winger idea 2019-07-24

Objection 2 answered: Jesus did not fail — his goal was to die for all so that whoever believes is saved

Mike rebuts the "failure of the Son" argument.

John 3:16 unlimited atonement failure of the Son extent vs. application
Mike Winger idea 2019-07-24

Objection 3 answered: intercession is available to all who draw near, not limited to a fixed elect group

Mike addresses the intercession objection using Hebrews 7:25.

James White Hebrews 7:25 James White unlimited atonement intercession
Mike Winger idea 2019-07-24

Ephesians 2 refutes the intercession argument: the elect were still under wrath after the cross, before believing

Mike uses Ephesians 2 as a direct rebuttal to the Calvinist intercession/atonement link.

Ephesians 2:1-3 election limited atonement intercession
Mike Winger idea 2019-07-24

Ephesians 2:11-13 reinforces: benefits of Christ's blood applied at the moment of belief, not at the cross

Further use of Ephesians 2 to argue for the extent/application distinction.

Ephesians 2:8-9 Ephesians 2:11-13 Ephesians 2:8-9 faith atonement
Mike Winger idea 2019-07-24

John Owen's trilemma answered: extent and application are distinct; the trilemma conflates them

Mike's direct rebuttal to John Owen's trilemma / false dilemma.

John Owen faith universalism unlimited atonement
Mike Winger idea 2019-07-24

Owen's trilemma implies the elect were forgiven before they believed — which Ephesians 2 contradicts

Secondary refutation of the trilemma from Ephesians 2.

Ephesians 2:1-3 faith limited atonement trilemma
Mike Winger idea 2019-07-24

Christ's work is not applied until belief; payment and application are two distinct moments

Positive resolution to the double payment problem.

faith imputation unlimited atonement
Mike Winger idea 2019-07-24

Application of atonement through faith is not a "secondary act of atonement"

Mike responds to the Calvinist rhetorical slogan that non-Calvinism requires a second atonement act.

atonement Calvinism unlimited atonement