1 Corinthians 12:21-25
1 Corinthians 12:21-25 — Body Interdependence and Honor for the Seemingly Lesser
"And the eye cannot say to the hand, 'I have no need of you'" (v.21) "those members of the body which we deem less honorable, on these we bestow more abundant honor" (v.23) "so that there may be no division (schisma) in the body, but that the members may have the same care for one another." (v.25)
Paul articulates three interdependent principles that function as filters for all subsequent instructions:
- No member may deny the need for another member — the eye/hand analogy rules out any claim that the church does not need the ministry of a particular class of people (e.g., women).
- Greater honor is to be given to those deemed less honorable — culturally marginalized members are to be elevated, not further restricted.
- No schism (schisma) — any practice that divides the body into those who may speak and those who may not introduces the very division Paul explicitly prohibits.
Applied to gender: women who were culturally "less honorable" in the Greco-Roman world are precisely the category Paul says the body must honor more, not silence.
Greek: schisma (σχίσμα) — "division/schism"
Schisma (v.25) is a tearing or split. Paul's concern is that no structural division form within the body. Dividing the congregation into those permitted to speak and those forbidden to speak along gender lines is precisely the kind of schisma Paul is guarding against.
For the full argument analysis, see the Argument Library entry.
Summary: See full content for details.
Greek Terms
v.25: Paul's stated goal is "no schisma in the body" — the standard against which gender-based silencing fails.
Your Tags
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...moreRelated Articles (22)
#More 110
Cheryl Schatz
Why Was The Woman Created For The Man
Cheryl Schatz
Are Womens Gifts For The Common Good
Cheryl Schatz
Are Womens Gifts Secondary
Cheryl Schatz
Are Gods Gifts Segregated
Cheryl Schatz
From Bobbed Hair Bossy Wives And Women Preachers To Woman Be Free
Cheryl Schatz
Paul As He Pleases 9
Cheryl Schatz
Mike Seaver And Cheryl Schatz Discussdebate Women In Ministry 4
Cheryl Schatz
Mike Seaver Cheryl Schatz 10
Cheryl Schatz
Two Gifts Or One
Cheryl Schatz
Calling God To Account
Cheryl Schatz
Phil Johnson Monstrous Divas
Cheryl Schatz
What Winger Presently Gets Wrong: Women Apostles
Andrew Bartlett & Terran Williams
Why Mike Winger is Wrong About “Authenteō” in 1 Timothy 2:12 – and Why It Matters
Andrew Bartlett & Terran Williams
The Debates Over 1 Timothy 2
Andrew Bartlett & Terran Williams
Communion & Lord's Supper — Research Notes (Cheryl Schatz)
Cheryl Schatz
Asking Right Questions
Cheryl Schatz
Women Preaching Equated With
Cheryl Schatz
I Dont Need You
Cheryl Schatz
What Winger Presently Gets Wrong: Women Leaders in the New Testament (PART A)
Andrew Bartlett & Terran Williams
What Winger Presently Gets Wrong: Women Leaders in the New Testament (PART B)
Terran Williams
A 14-Point Biblical Case for Women Leaders and Teachers And Why Mike Winger, The Gospel Coalition, and the Southern Baptists Are Wrong About This
Andrew Bartlett & Terran Williams
Debate Resources
5General Exegesis
(5)Schenck, Kenneth
Garland, David E.
Plummer, Alfred A.; Robertson, Archibald T.
Collins, Raymond F.
Thiselton, Anthony C.