Where Mike Winger Went Wrong on Women

Comprehensive response to the entire Mike Winger Women in Ministry video series (Parts 1-13)

Why Mike Winger is Wrong About “Authenteō” in 1 Timothy 2:12 – and Why It Matters

Response to Mike Winger's Women in Ministry Part 12 on the meaning of authenteō in 1 Timothy 2:12

A First Response to Mike Winger’s 11½ Hrs Video on 1 Timothy 2

A first response to Mike Winger's 11.5-hour Women in Ministry Part 12 video on 1 Timothy 2

What Winger Presently Gets Wrong: Women Apostles

Response to Mike Winger's Women in Ministry Part 5 on whether women were apostles in the New Testament

What Winger Presently Gets Wrong With Genesis 1–3: ‘Was Women’s Submission Just A Curse To Be Overturned?’

Response to Mike Winger's Women in Ministry Part 2 on Genesis 1-3 and whether women's submission was just a curse to be overturned

The context surrounding John 6

In explaining the meaning of John 6, we need to pay close attention to the context surrounding John 6 as well as the relevant context from the entire book of John. Here are some verses that are HIGHLY relevant and some questions for you to ponder.

Putting Jesus in His Place: The Case for the Deity of Christ

Robert Bowman, J. Ed Komoszewski, and Darrell L. Bock — Kindle highlights from 'Putting Jesus in His Place: The Case for the Deity of Christ'. 100 highlights.

Men Taken Womens Good Portion

> “…Mary has chosen the good portion, which will not be taken away from her. ”  Luke 10:41-42

Common Objections To Women In Ministry

One of the first objections to women in ministry is the fact that Jesus chose only males as his twelve apostles. If Jesus only chose men for this special “class” of people who were to be His witnesses of the resurrection, then didn’t Jesus show by this act that He does not allow women to minister in

@terryne02461221 You didn’t say differently but what you think the Bible teaches seems to come more from the Watchtower and not the Bible itself. ➡️ **Jesus raised Himself**: John 2:19-22, where Jesus said, "Destroy this temple, and in three days I ...

@terryne02461221 You didn’t say differently but what you think the Bible teaches seems to come more from the Watchtower and not the Bible itself. ➡️ **Jesus raised Himself**: John 2:19-22, where Jesu

@JamesPelton18 @William_E_Wolfe Will Servant @will_servant corrected me by notin

@JamesPelton18 @William_E_Wolfe Will Servant @will_servant corrected me by noting that in John 21:16, Jesus tells Peter to shepherd the church. So we do have an explicit identification.

1 Timothy 2:11-15

Sections: cross_references, debate_points, exegesis, greek_analysis

Luke 24:1-26

Sections: cross_references, debate_points, exegesis, greek_analysis

John 20:15-17

Sections: debate_points, exegesis, greek_analysis

Ephesians 5:18-33

Sections: cross_references, debate_points, exegesis, greek_analysis

Ephesians 4:11-13

Sections: debate_points, exegesis, greek_analysis

Genesis 5:2

Sections: debate_points, exegesis, greek_analysis

1 Timothy 2:1-7

Sections: cross_references, debate_points, exegesis, greek_analysis

Genesis 3:1-7

Sections: cross_references, debate_points, exegesis, greek_analysis

Romans 12:4-8

Sections: cross_references, debate_points, exegesis, greek_analysis

John 6:43-45

Sections: cross_references, debate_points, exegesis

John 6:44

Sections: debate_points, exegesis, greek_analysis

1 John 2:2

Sections: cross_references, debate_points, exegesis, greek_analysis

2 Corinthians 5:14-15

Sections: cross_references, debate_points, exegesis

Hebrews 2:9

Sections: cross_references, debate_points, exegesis

John 3:16

Sections: cross_references, debate_points, exegesis

John 12:32

Sections: cross_references, debate_points, exegesis

Titus 2:11

Sections: cross_references, debate_points, exegesis

Joel 2:28-29

Sections: cross_references, debate_points, exegesis, greek_analysis

ἡ (anaphoric) (he (anaphoric))

the (anaphoric article — pointing back to a previously introduced noun)

ἕλκω (helkō)

to draw, attract, drag

ἱλασμός (hilasmos)

propitiation, atoning sacrifice

κόσμος (kosmos)

world, created order, humanity

ποιμαίνω (poimaino)

to shepherd, to tend a flock, to pastor, to rule

Proof text #1: John 2:19-21 and the destroyed temple

Evidence for bodily continuity across resurrection

Proof text #4: John 20:24-28 and Thomas's demand

Continuity of crucifixion marks in resurrection body

Q&A — Luke 23:43 and John 20:17: Jesus eating post-resurrection and 'do not cling to me'

Viewer asks about the relationship between two post-resurrection passages

Thomas touching Jesus in Luke — touching is fine, clinging is what was forbidden in John 20:17

Clarifying John 20:17 by comparison to the Thomas passage

Undesigned coincidences are places where one biblical document unexpectedly explains or fills in a detail from another without any apparent coordination between authors. The example given: Mark 14 records that witnesses at Jesus' trial quoted a saying about 'destroying this temple' but their testimonies disagreed — without explaining why. John 2 supplies the original context (Jesus meant his body), even though John doesn't include the trial scene. This kind of interlocking detail is characteristic of authentic historical accounts, not coordinated invention.

Mike's disagreement with Vatican II's claim that Muslims worship the one true God

Responding to Lumen Gentium's statement about Muslims

Pivot to objections: addressing 'but what about?' passages that skeptics use to support the faith-without-evidence definition

Mike transitions from positive case to handling counter-passages.

John 20:24-29 — Thomas passage: 'not seen' does not mean 'without evidence'

Mike addresses the Thomas story as the third counter-passage.

Thomas's demand to see the nail marks refutes Jehovah's Witness teaching that Jesus rose in a different body

Side point made while explaining the Thomas narrative.

Jesus gives Thomas evidence first, then commands belief — a model of evidence-based faith

The climax of Mike's Thomas analysis.

Thomas's rebuke was for ignoring available evidence, not for demanding evidence — modern believers have the same pre-appearance evidence

Mike draws the application of the Thomas story to contemporary Christian faith.

Reading 1 John in context: the commandment John has in view is love and faith in Jesus Christ, not the Mosaic law

Mike does a sustained contextual reading of 1 John 2 and 3 to determine what John meant by "commandments."

Walking as Jesus walked does not mean obeying the OT law — it could equally mean itinerant preaching only to Jews, or staying in Israel, which no one applies literally

Mike challenges the 119 Ministries use of 1 John 2:6 ("walk as he walked") by following the logic consistently.

119 Ministries contradicts itself: early they say Torah-keeping is not required for salvation; later they imply it is, calling non-observance "denying the faith"

Mike plays two clips from 119 Ministries showing an internal contradiction between their opening disclaimer and their later conclusion.

Baptism does not secure salvation; it is an outward expression of inward faith

Q&A on whether post-baptism sin causes a loss of the security received at baptism.

Prosperity gospel critique: misappropriates OT promises to Israel, ignores Jesus's teachings on suffering and cross-bearing.

Continuing the prosperity gospel discussion.