Romans 1:24-28
Romans 1:24-28 — "God Gave Them Over"
The Text
"Therefore God gave them over in the lusts of their hearts to impurity... For this reason God gave them over to degrading passions... God gave them over to a depraved mind" (NASB)
The Pattern of "Giving Over"
Romans 1:24-28 contains a threefold repetition of παρέδωκεν ("gave over" / "handed over") — the same root as παραδίδωμι. This is not God causing sin but God withdrawing restraint as a judicial response to human rebellion. The sequence is: 1. v. 24 — "God gave them over in the lusts of their hearts to impurity" — because they exchanged the glory of God for idols (v. 23) 2. v. 26 — "God gave them over to degrading passions" — because they exchanged the truth of God for a lie (v. 25) 3. v. 28 — "God gave them over to a depraved mind" — because they did not see fit to acknowledge God (v. 28a)
Each "giving over" is explicitly a RESPONSE to a prior human action. The human rebellion comes first; God's judicial hardening follows.
Connection to Pharaoh and Divine Hardening
The Romans 1 pattern is the same pattern seen in the Pharaoh narrative. God does not create the rebellion; He responds to it. Just as Pharaoh hardened his own heart first and God then intensified that hardening through circumstances, so in Romans 1 the nations first "suppressed the truth in unrighteousness" (v. 18) and God then gave them over to the consequences of their own choices.
"God Made It Evident to Them" (Romans 1:19-20)
Before any "giving over," God first revealed Himself to all people through creation. "That which is known about God is evident within them; for God made it evident to them" (v. 19). This is universal revelation — consistent with John 12:32 (Jesus draws ALL men) and the provisionist understanding that God makes Himself available to all before any judgment falls.
The Theological Point
God's hardening/giving over is not arbitrary predestination but judicial response. The "giving over" presupposes: (1) prior revelation from God, (2) human suppression of that revelation, (3) God's withdrawal of restraining grace as judgment. This is the opposite of the Calvinist claim that God withholds grace from those He has not elected — Romans 1 shows God GIVING revelation first and only withdrawing in response to rejection.
Source: Synthesized from Cheryl Schatz, articles 379, 374 (The Giving blog); Romans 1 contextual analysis
Cross-References for Romans 1:24-28
- Romans 1:18-20 — The foundation: God revealed Himself through creation; humanity suppressed the truth. The giving-over is the consequence.
- Romans 9:17-18 — Pharaoh parallel: God hardens whom He desires, and that desire is directed at the proud and rebellious.
- Exodus 7:3; 9:12 — God hardened Pharaoh after Pharaoh's established pattern of self-hardening.
- 2 Thessalonians 2:9-12 — God sends deluding influence on those who "did not receive the love of the truth so as to be saved." Same pattern: rejection first, judicial hardening second.
- James 4:6 — "God is opposed to the proud, but gives grace to the humble." The principle governing who is "given over."
- John 12:32 — Jesus draws ALL to Himself — universal provision precedes any judicial giving-over.
- 2 Peter 3:9 — God is not wishing for any to perish — the giving-over is not God's desire but His judicial response.
- Acts 7:42 — "God turned away and delivered them over to serve the host of heaven." Stephen describes the same pattern in Israel's history.
- Psalm 81:11-12 — "But My people did not listen to My voice... So I gave them over to the stubbornness of their heart." OT precedent for the Romans 1 pattern.
For the full argument analysis, see the Argument Library entry.
Summary: 1. The text explicitly states WHY God gave them over — because of their prior rejection. "Because they exchanged the glory of God..." (v. 23); "because they exchanged the truth of God for a lie" (v. 25); "they did not see fit to acknowledge God" (v. 28). This is conditional, not unconditional.
Greek Terms
παρέδωκεν — threefold 'God gave them over' — judicial abandonment
Your Tags
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...moreRelated Articles (32)
An Update On Our Move
Cheryl Schatz
Is There Support For Universal Male Headship
Cheryl Schatz
Are Females Saved Just Like Males
Cheryl Schatz
Shaming The Head 3
Cheryl Schatz
Interdependence In The Lord
Cheryl Schatz
Tektonics On 1 Corinthians 14
Cheryl Schatz
Are Gods Gifts Segregated
Cheryl Schatz
Matt Slick And Cheryl Schatz Debate 2
Cheryl Schatz
The Rest Of The Story 1 Timothy 211 15 And Matt Slick
Cheryl Schatz
Answering Matt Slicks Agenda On 1 Timothy 2:12
Cheryl Schatz
Only One Verse
Cheryl Schatz
Scriptural Fences
Cheryl Schatz
Authority And Created Order
Cheryl Schatz
1 Cor14 Concludes
Cheryl Schatz
Reading The Scriptures Without A Male Bias
Cheryl Schatz
Was 1 Timothy 2 Written To The Church
Cheryl Schatz
Round 4 Interview With The Apostle Paul
Cheryl Schatz
Paul As He Pleases 9
Cheryl Schatz
1 Peter 3 6 Obey
Cheryl Schatz
Mike Seaver And Cheryl Schatz 2
Cheryl Schatz
Evaluating Schatz Seaver Debate
Cheryl Schatz
John Piper Takes Leave Of Ministry To Work On His Marriage
Cheryl Schatz
1 Timothy 212 Prohibitions Revisited
Cheryl Schatz
Specific Or General Woman
Cheryl Schatz
The Debates Over 1 Timothy 2
Andrew Bartlett & Terran Williams
No one can come to Jesus unless the Father draws him John 6:43-45
Cheryl Schatz
Jesus draws all men to Himself? John 12:32
Cheryl Schatz
What comes before the Giving? James White and John 6:37
Cheryl Schatz
Was God’s Wrath Satisfied in Christ or Paid in Hell?
Cheryl Schatz
The Giving Part 2: Judas the Betrayer, a Balanced View of the Sovereignty of God
Cheryl Schatz
Questioning the Bible: 11 Major Challenges to the Bible''s Authority
Jonathan Morrow
Why Mike Winger is Wrong About “Authenteō” in 1 Timothy 2:12 – and Why It Matters
Andrew Bartlett & Terran Williams
Debate Resources
3General Exegesis
(3)Picirilli, Robert E.
Moo, Douglas J.
Moo, Douglas J.