The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus

Gary R. Habermas and Michael R. Licona — Kindle highlights from 'The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus'. 110 highlights.

What did the death of Jesus do for the world?

The death of Jesus for the world is a delicate question for Calvinists according to John Piper. Piper answers a question from one of his listeners in a post called “ In What Sense Did Jesus Die for the Non-Elect? ” In the audio transcript of an interview Piper says:

Eph 5 Infected

In my last post, I presented one of the best sermons that I have ever heard on Ephesians 5, regarding the evidence of Spirit-filled lives for both men and women. This post is on the opposite of the Spirit-filled life which is an influx of worldly infection through male-centered pride

John Piper Takes Leave Of Ministry To Work On His Marriage

On March 28, 2010, complementarian John Piper announced that he is leaving ministry for a time because of several issues of pride that were affecting his soul and had taken a toll on his relationship with his wife Noël. Below is what Piper has written about his issues and his next steps

Neopatriarch Once Again Fails To Refute Cheryl Schatz

## Challenging my position that 1 Timothy 2:15 is a single woman

Semi Egalitarians

USA Today has an editorial written by David P Gushee in which Mr. Gushee challenges complementarians that they are actually semi-egalitarians and they should be willing to openly acknowledge this

@brentprint @rashmoosten @brmorris One of the things that almost sucked me into a Cavinist worldview was the ability of RC Sproul to speak so convincingly. One really has to have their Bible open and actively be reading to not be easily taken in beca...

@brentprint @rashmoosten @brmorris One of the things that almost sucked me into a Cavinist worldview was the ability of RC Sproul to speak so convincingly. One really has to have their Bible open and

@LiamHarperBlack @autocorrect2_0 You have trained your so-called common sense to

@LiamHarperBlack @autocorrect2_0 You have trained your so-called common sense to fit your pre-existing worldview. You need to retrain it with scripture by reading it in context.

@dan_cameron99 @pauldirks @BillboardChris No, but I'm not sure what you plan to

@dan_cameron99 @pauldirks @BillboardChris No, but I'm not sure what you plan to debate on exactly. Are you wanting to debate that the secular school system should teach a Christian worldview?

@subq I’m actually allowing scripture to shape my worldview. If you are indeed d

@subq I’m actually allowing scripture to shape my worldview. If you are indeed doing that, then show me on what scriptural basis your view stands?

@DWorldviews @_JacobLovelace @smashbaals What does the lexicon say this word mea

@DWorldviews @_JacobLovelace @smashbaals What does the lexicon say this word means? What do you think Paul means by using this term?

@DWorldviews @_JacobLovelace @smashbaals And effeminate is the man taking care o

@DWorldviews @_JacobLovelace @smashbaals And effeminate is the man taking care of the household tasks while the wife works? Allowing her to co-lead the family? Sharing leadership with women in church?

@JohnMoo26668690 That’s rediculous and completely false. Why would you fight ag

@JohnMoo26668690 That’s rediculous and completely false. Why would you fight against a Biblical worldview of the church? Don’t you know about feminism? Egalitarianism is not feminism! https://t.co/4

@MrNicholls77 @JuditKitty @RichardDawkins Better to teach kids the difference between evidence and interpretations of the evidence, how to spot assumptions and judge based on arguments instead of conclusions. Kids also need to understand what a worl...

@MrNicholls77 @JuditKitty @RichardDawkins Better to teach kids the difference between evidence and interpretations of the evidence, how to spot assumptions and judge based on arguments instead of conc

Q&A: Non-Christian friends interested in understanding worldview — all worldviews must be consistent and accurate

Viewer's observation about non-Christian friends being open to worldview discussion

Livestream is framed as an exercise in loving God with the mind — building the Christian worldview intellectually

Introduction to the weekly Tuesday livestream format

Q: Does God killing babies make it okay for humans? Winger dismisses the question as absurd; Sye says context of OT law must be applied and God has prerogative over life

Audience challenge question; ethical objection to Old Testament

Winger's approach to skeptical worldviews: challenge the person to live consistently with their beliefs. He recounts a conversation with a man who believed reality was an illusion and 'all is one' — but who refused to give away his possessions, proving he didn't actually believe what he claimed. Atheism similarly cannot be lived consistently (e.g., pretending moral values exist).

Atheists can be gullible too: skeptics sometimes have a low bar for accepting anti-Christian claims, just as Christians can have a low bar for confirming their own beliefs

Key thematic statement of the video

Closing challenge to skeptics: be critical of your own criticisms — if you laugh at Christians, make sure you have good reason to; you may have adopted the dogma of your own worldview uncritically

Mike's closing remarks to both Christian and skeptic viewers

Is homosexuality genetic? Even if it were, it wouldn't change the Christian call to self-denial

Q&A question about whether homosexuality has a genetic component and what its presence in the animal kingdom implies.

Christians should engage in politics as salt and light; political views must be biblically tested

Viewer asking whether Christians should get involved in politics, referencing Martin Luther King Jr.

How to evangelize pantheists: demonstrate Christianity is true rather than directly refuting pantheism.

Michael Gilbert asks how to evangelize to pantheists and polytheists and prove their views false.

The Christian hope of eschatological restoration answers the problem of evil: God wiping away every tear, remaking of heaven and earth

Mike elaborates his response to the problem of evil using Christian eschatology

Mike argues that atheism, consistently followed, leads to nihilism — no morality, purpose, beauty, love, personhood, free will, or meaning

Mike offers his counter-worldview assessment

Q&A: Calling God a "moral thug" (Matt Dillahunty) is logically incoherent within theism because God is the grounding for morality

Question from Mariano Rogers about Matt Dillahunty's rhetoric

Dr. Sean McDowell background: professor at Biola/Talbot, high school teacher, speaker on theology, worldview, and culture

McDowell introduces himself

Gen Z defined: the first digitally native generation, and the generation with significantly increased loneliness, depression, and suicidality

McDowell lays out two of the most defining characteristics of Gen Z

Practical parenting principle: integrate discipleship into activities you are already doing rather than adding new programs

McDowell addresses practical application for parents

Gen Z's underlying worldview challenge: a consumer culture that conditions them to expect reality to conform to their desires rather than conform to external reality

McDowell identifies the deeper worldview issue beneath Gen Z's post-truth tendencies

Practical idea: worldview movie nights — watch culturally relevant films with kids and discuss them

McDowell shares a practical tip while waiting for Q&A questions to come in

Q&A: Rooting youth in the person and work of Christ — requires both good theology (who Jesus is) and practical application (how to live it out)

Audience question about how churches can help youth be rooted in Christ

David Hume as possible earlier source of the idea behind the slogan

Mike traces the philosophical lineage of the slogan back to the 18th century.

Biblical worldview should transcend culture wars rather than being shaped by either conservative or liberal culture

Opening monologue before Q&A begins

Biblical cosmology should not be assumed to match ancient Near Eastern flat-earth cosmology just because surrounding cultures believed it; Genesis radically demythologizes creation compared to the Enuma Elish

Response to question about Hebraic cosmology and the flat-earth interpretation

Kalam Cosmological Argument — everything that begins to exist has a cause

McLatchie presents the Kalam Cosmological Argument as part of natural theology.

Worldview gap: secular view — people are generally good and deserve heaven; biblical view — the opposite

Explaining why gospel sounds offensive to secular ears

Identity vs. behavior: biblical view calls homosexuality a behavioral issue, not core identity

Explaining the communication breakdown between Christians and LGBTQ+ individuals

The Christian message is not targeting homosexuality but all behavior against God

Clarifying that Christian ethics are universally applied, not targeted

Methodological principle: dismissing miracle claims in historical sources reflects worldview bias, not following the evidence

Responding to the claim that miracle claims in historical sources can be safely dismissed

Resource recommendation for documented modern miracles: Craig Keener's two-volume work "Miracles" provides medical/testimonial evidence catalogued by a respected scholar.

Q&A — viewer asks for visible evidence that gifts of healing are active today.

Four target audiences for BibleThinker ministry

Winger articulates the specific audiences he aims to reach through his online ministry.

Slogan 3: "All religions teach basically the same thing" — superficial similarities mask fundamental contradictions

Second major pluralist slogan addressed

Christian worldview distinctives: personal God, imago Dei, sin, grace, salvation by faith

Comparison of Christianity's core claims against other religions

It is epistemically wrong to require Christians to answer every argument or question before their faith is valid

Critique of the epistemic standard often imposed by internet atheism

Michael Heiser: highly commended as a scholar-communicator; divine council theory (Deut 32, Ps 82) personally rejected but engagement required

Q from David Hinnebog asking for comment on Michael Heiser and his divine council theory.

Presuppositional apologetics debate: Mike rejects the claim that evidential apologists need shared worldview common ground

Q&A from Daniel C about whether neutral or common ground exists in apologetics

Jesus did not come to "dismantle systems of oppression" — projecting modern political terminology onto Jesus creates an idol

Question from Steph T about the claim that Jesus came to dismantle systems of oppression.

Advice for teenagers in the church — serve humbly, aim higher than leaders, evangelize peers

A teen asks for suggestions on how to contribute to the church.

Molinism — middle knowledge reconciles divine sovereignty and human free will

A viewer asks about Molinism as a worldview for reconciling sovereignty and free will.