Search — Theology Explorer

Filter results by source database — Scripture Commentary, Theology, Mike Winger, or Pulpit. Click a tab to narrow to one database.

...more

All (757) Mike Winger (757)

Mike Winger idea 2018-01-24

Conclusion: Mormonism and Christianity use the same vocabulary but are completely opposed in meaning — Mormonism is a false Christianity that fails historically, biblically, and rationally.

Mike summarizes the entire vocabulary comparison section and delivers his conclusion about the categorical incompatibility of the two faiths.

apologetics Mormonism vs. Christianity interfaith categories

Mike Winger idea 2018-01-24

Q&A: Many Mormons don't know their own doctrine until their mission trip, where they encounter informed Christians and discover the differences for the first time.

Viewer question: 'Why do so many Mormons consider themselves Christians even though their doctrine seems completely different? Are they not aware of the obvious differences?'

Conclusion: Mormonism and Christianity use the same vocabulary but are completely opposed in meaning — Mormonism is a false Christianity that fails historically, biblically, and rationally.

Q&A: Many Mormons don't know their own doctrine until their mission trip, where they encounter informed Christians and discover the differences for the first time.

Q&A: Most Mormons are not convinced by intellectual arguments — they are committed emotionally through 'testimony,' an emotionally validated belief experience.

Strategy for reaching Mormons: question the reliability of the 'burning in the bosom' as a source of truth, then lead them toward evidence-based epistemology.

Closing prayer: asking God for love and compassion toward Mormons, wisdom in conversation, and for Mormons to find the true grace of Christ.

James 2 as the key battleground in the faith-alone vs. faith-plus-works debate

Catholicism, Mormonism, Jehovah's Witnesses all oppose sola fide — Mike sees their agreement as confirming the unique gospel

Protestant position: salvation by grace through faith apart from works — Ephesians 2:8-9

Catholic counter-argument: James 2:24 is the only place 'faith alone' appears in Scripture — and it negates it

Protestant counter using Romans 3:28 and Romans 4 — Abraham justified by faith, not works

Catholic counter using James 2:21 — Abraham justified by works when he offered Isaac

Full reading of James 2:14-26

Conclusion of hermeneutical argument: 'justified' in James 2 means proven/demonstrated to be right, not salvifically made righteous

James 2:14 — 'Can that faith save him?' — the hypothetical about someone who says he has faith but lacks works

James 2:14 introduces 'easy believism' — the person who says 'Jesus is my Savior but not my Lord'

Greek article 'that' (hē) in James 2:14 — 13 of 16 translations include it, pointing to 'that particular faith' as the referent

Greek 'ophelos' — 'what good is it' means what benefit or advantage; James is asking about the salvific utility of dead faith

James 2:15-16 — the man who tells the needy 'go, be warm and filled' without helping; a parallel to dead faith

James 2:17 — 'faith by itself, if it does not have works, is dead' — the quality of faith is in question, not the quantity of works

James 2:18 — misunderstood verse: James is voicing an objector's position and then rejecting it, not affirming works over faith

James 2:18b — 'I will show you my faith by my works' — works demonstrate faith, faith is still the issue

James 2:19 — 'Even demons believe and shudder' — intellectual assent alone is not saving faith

Self-deception of the person with dead faith — James 1:22 'deceiving yourselves'

James 2:20 — calling the dead-faith person a 'fool' is a pastoral wake-up call, not an insult

James 2 is about how salvation is demonstrated, not how salvation is accomplished — massive hermeneutical distinction

James 2:21 — 'justified by works when he offered Isaac' uses 'justified' in the vindication sense, not the salvific sense

Genesis 15:6 — Abraham's salvific justification happened decades before the Isaac incident

Genesis 22:12 — 'Now I know that you fear God' — the Isaac incident is God/the observer confirming Abraham's faith is real

James 2:22-23 — faith was active with works; faith was completed by works; Genesis 15:6 fulfilled in the Isaac offering

Application: real faith will eventually bear fruit/works, even if years later (as with Abraham)

James 2:24 — 'justified by works and not by faith alone' means vindicated before people, not made righteous before God

James 2:25 — Rahab the prostitute also 'justified by works' in the same sense as Abraham — demonstrating real faith through action

James 2:26 — 'faith apart from works is dead' — the body/spirit analogy shows two kinds of faith, not faith vs. works for salvation

James 2 is 'radically abused' by false groups to twist the gospel — knowing it is necessary for apologetics

Summary of theological points: James does not contradict sola fide; it combats dead faith / easy believism

Saving faith is not mere intellectual belief — it is living faith that results in works

Two formulas contrasted: Catholic (faith + works = salvation) vs. Christian/James (faith = salvation + works as result)

Harmonization: James perfectly harmonizes with Romans, Galatians, and Ephesians when properly interpreted

Ephesians 2:10 — 'created for good works which God prepared beforehand' — saved FOR works, not BY works

Challenge to Catholics: Romans 11:6 — grace and works are diametrically opposed; if works, grace is no longer grace

Romans 4:4-5 — wages vs. gift; faith counted as righteousness to the one who does not work but believes

Ephesians 2:8-10 echoes James: saved by grace not works (vv.8-9), then created for good works (v.10)

Pastoral warning: there are people who think they know Christ but do not — James 2 is a wake-up call, not a condemnation

Contrast between demons (believe and tremble) and the easy-believer (believes and boasts) — the worse of the two

Q&A: can someone have saving faith yet commit murder? — Mike argues sin is not binary; Jesus elevated even hatred and lust to the level of murder and adultery

Degrees of sin — some sins are worse than others; the Law has different consequences; Jesus said some will suffer greater judgment

Q&A: Does faith necessarily produce works, or are works only the way the world sees faith? James 2 is about justification in the eyes of men, not God

Groups that use James 2 substitute their own list of required works (sacraments, tongues, church membership) for James's actual examples (tongue, helping poor)

The thief on the cross — deathbed conversion with no works is consistent with James 2 because James addresses ongoing Christian life

Q&A: Apologetics effectiveness debated — Mike strongly defends apologetics against claims it doesn't work with Millennials

Bible Link Settings